The End of Berlusconi and the Future of Italy
For nearly two decades Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi inspired voters with his enthusiasm, but he brought no reform to Italy. Now his likely successor and the European Central Bank are setting out with a host of reforms, but have no enthusiasm to get them passed.
GIANNI RIOTTA is a columnist for La Stampa and teaches new media at Princeton University. He is the author, most recently, of The Things I Learned (Le Cose Che Ho Imparato).
To outsiders, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi may appear to be an Italian extravagance. But behind the political and sexual scandals hides a history of moral malaise.

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is on the way out, the story goes. Come Monday, his center-right coalition, which has dominated Italian politics for nearly 20 years, will be a thing of the past, and Italy will be spared the wrath of the European debt crisis. The opposition thinks it is time to uncork the prosecco.
But it is not. Italy is far from fixed.
Berlusconi first walked the magnificent halls of the Palazzo Chigi -- the palatial prime minister's residence -- in 1994, when he was a media tycoon, football entrepreneur, a bon vivant, a billionaire, and all of a sudden founder of a political party, Forza Italia. Sophisticated analysts spurned the new party, but for two decades Forza Italia locked in the support of at least a third of the Italian electorate. It won three national elections. And over the years, Berlusconi lined up tens of thousands of political operatives to run the country's major regions and cities, from Lombardy to Sicily and from Milan to Rome.
Voters were captivated by Berlusconi's anti-establishment war cry: "I am a self-made man, not a politician!" They loved his unbridled optimism, his populist style. However, although the prime minister railed against the status quo in his speeches, he failed to reform Italy's stilted economy. He never touched the fat cats -- the tax dodgers, the clubby entrepreneurs who spurned innovation, the class of lobbyists always tied up in shady deals -- or the way they divided public money and assets with little regard for merit and productivity, but instead according to their old web of family and friends. He frequently clashed with the country's powerful unions but never managed to energize the country's sluggish labor market.
Berlusconi's lifestyle was frivolous and excessive. The leftist papers regularly trashed him and his sex parties. (Indeed, it was how the world came to learn the meaning of "bunga bunga.") There were the groupies, the prostitutes, the shiny dancing poles in his villas. The scandals never impressed his supporters, but they did not hurt him, either. At last count, Berlusconi and his staunch ally, Umberto Bossis Northern League, enjoyed 35 percent support in the polls -- not bad after a 20-year run. Even the Catholic Church, while deprecating Berlusconi for his sins, never cut ties with his coalition; dignified Catholic leaders kept serving in the center-right cabinet up to the very end.
What doomed Berlusconi was not The Economist cover that deemed him "unfit" to run Italy. It was not the gaffes, or his screaming at U.S. President Barack Obama, upsetting the queen of England, partying with Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and playing peek-a-boo with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
No, when history judges the lurid Berlusconi saga, bunga bunga will be nothing more than a juicy footnote. After all, the ancient Roman historian Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus enriched his biographies of Julius Caesar with the dirt on sex and the eternal city, but then, as now, the economy trumped the orgies. Berlusconi boasted that he was a man of the market, but it was the market that devoured his party, his coalition, and his cabinet.
Berlusconi's economic faults were legion. He failed to invest in schools, universities, or research, which undercut productivity over time. He shortchanged the technology sector. He never undertook a fair reform of the tax system. He promised more than $1 billion to upgrade broadband but never delivered a cent. Instead, Italy wasted 20 years building up a national debt of $2.6 trillion and nothing else. For nearly all of the last decade, the Italian economy has not grown faster than one percent annually. At this crawling pace, it will take more than a decade to recover just the losses of the financial crisis of 2008. For that, the country needs more babies, an expanding economy, more innovation, more infrastructure, more productivity, more graduates, and more women at work and in the corner office. The challenge ahead is considerable.
At 85, Italian President Giorgio Napolitano is the country's last wise man. He is pushing to install Mario Monti, a respected economist, in Berlusconi's place. That will be no easy feat. Monti has to muster a majority in parliament by bringing over Berlusconi allies, the Catholic moderate center, and the progressive Democratic Party. The radicals -- Northern League and Italy of Values -- will vote against him, because they spurn national unity and thrive on controversies. Their numbers are not enough to stop Monti, but they will wage a guerrilla war against his reforms. Berlusconi will maintain control of at least a robust chunk of his party, and his first move will be to ask his right-hand man, Gianni Letta, a moderate, to serve in the coalition. Giuliano Amato, a socialist and former prime minister, will likely serve as well. Their job will be simple and terrible: to gain back the market's confidence, cut the debt, chase tax dodgers, reduce the excesses of the welfare state, promote innovation, and above all, restore growth.
- previous-disabled
- Page 1of 2
- next
Related
The national election turned over Spain's government, but the remedy on the way -- fiscal austerity as pushed by Berlin and the European Central Bank -- will only make Madrid's problems worse. Cutting will not save the euro.
"The Russians seem to me more bent on taking ports in the Mediterranean than in destroying Bonaparte in Egypt." So wrote Horatio Nelson in 1799. Whether "Bonaparte" is regarded as a synonym for President Nasser or for the Sixth Fleet, these words could hardly be improved upon as a reflection of the present state of Western consternation about Soviet objectives in the Mediterranean. Do the beginnings of a Soviet naval presence there mark the end of an era during which the Mediterranean has been dominated by a succession of single powers?
New general elections will be held in Italy in May. The present government coalition (formed by Christian Democrats and Socialists, with the addition of the very few but earnest Republicans) will defend itself on two fronts. From the radical Right will come the assaults of the not-numerous neo- Fascists and the still scarcer last-stand Monarchists; much more vigorous and dangerous attacks will be launched by the radical Left, the Communists and the revolutionary Socialists. Both radical Right and Left are theoretically sworn to destroy the present state of things and erect diametrically opposite régimes on the smoking ruins and the carnage. Such apocalyptic prospectives are not difficult to defeat, as they provoke more fear than hope in large sectors of the electorate.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.