In today's world, where risks and their impacts are difficult to predict, the correct responses are uncertain, and no country solve every problem on its own, resilience and dynamism are key.
W. LEE HOWELL is the managing director and a member of the Managing Board of the World Economic Forum and the editor of the Global Risks 2013 report.
(Tony Hall / Flickr)
This month, the World Economic Forum will convene world leaders at its annual meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland. The theme this year is Resilient Dynamism, an idea that also shapes the Forum's forthcoming flagship report, Global Risks 2013. Resilience and dynamism are the qualities that countries most need to thrive in today's world, but neither is alone sufficient. It is the combination that makes the difference.
Resilience is crucial because, in a hyperconnected and interdependent world, no one country or organization can manage global challenges on its own. To be resilient is to be able to adapt to changing political and economic contexts and pursue critical goals while also being able to withstand and recover from sudden shocks. Today's biggest challenges, meanwhile, also demand dynamism -- overcoming the ongoing global economic malaise, for example, requires the capacity for bold vision and even bolder action.
The Global Risks 2013 report is based on an in-depth survey of more than 1,000 experts across the world. It measures their perceptions of the potential impact of 50 global risks over the next ten years and, most important, how interconnected those risks are. Those surveyed selected "severe income disparity" followed by "chronic fiscal imbalances" as the two most prevalent global risks. These results reflect ongoing concerns about high levels of government debt and a somewhat pessimistic overall economic outlook. After a year scarred by extreme weather, experts rated "rising greenhouse gas emissions" third. They rated "failure of climate change adaptation" -- our inability to adapt adequately -- as having the most knock-on effects of all challenges in the environmental category. Viewed together, these findings point to a profound concern over whether the world can address climate change and economic hardship simultaneously...
Related
THE famous saying of La Bruyere: "Everything has been said; and it is too late . . ." haunts my mind when I consider the sad plight of Europe. So many remarkable works have been written on this subject that one is discouraged at the thought of undertaking a further explanation. However, I must make the attempt, not only because I am not content to restrict myself to existing authorities, but also because the cinematographic vicissitudes of contemporary economic policy require constant modifications of detail in the pictures drawn but yesterday by the most intelligent observers.
POLITICAL history is not a sequence of incoherent and haphazard events but a chain of causes and effects. A single individual may decide from one day to the next to alter the whole course and character of his existence, to close one chapter and begin another entirely different in tone and construction. Nations cannot. They are subject to the laws of evolution, for even a revolution is generally only evolution--an explosive sequence of events crowded into a short space of time, but leaving more of the ancien régime untouched than usually is at first apparent.
