RETURNING home after years of service in Viet Nam, I am nagged by the insistent thought that we have not yet adequately answered a plain question: What is it, exactly, that we seek in Viet Nam?
STILL THE SEARCH FOR GOALS
RETURNING home after years of service in Viet Nam, I am nagged by the insistent thought that we have not yet adequately answered a plain question: What is it, exactly, that we seek in Viet Nam?
The question is hardly a new one. It has been asked over and over again and answered as often, in statements by leaders in Viet Nam and by leaders elsewhere, among them several Presidents of the United States and even a number of thoughtful writers in this review. Yet, judging by the nature of the actions undertaken in Viet Nam and by the continuing debates over the issues of the war wherever they can be freely discussed, it is evident that the answers have not satisfied a need and that the question remains still posed, alive, demanding.
We have to answer the question fully. In stopping short of complete answers, we may be compounding the cost of this long struggle in terms of irreplaceable human and spiritual resources as well as in material expenditures. This is most obvious on the battleground in Asia, but at home, too, the probing has gone so deeply that it touches the innermost core of American beliefs, troubling us more perhaps than any issue since the Civil War.
Without a sound answer, the seemingly endless war in Viet Nam becomes just that-seemingly endless. Alternatively, it may be headed for an end that could be dishonorable, with profound consequences. As a people who pride themselves on being pragmatic, we can surely accept the practical idea that when we are all risking so much to get some place, we must agree on the destination, so that all of our efforts will be directed toward it, not dispersed, reversed, tangled or impeded. We need goals that are truly defined, as a constant guide to action, whether for the prosecution of the war or for the founding of a just peace.
II
About two thousand years ago, Matthew of Capernaum said: "Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?" Are our actions in Viet Nam such that they will bear grapes and figs, or are we gathering only thorns and thistles? The answer of course is that we have been in an allegorical jungle, mixing up vines, trees, thorns and thistles in grand profusion. Perhaps we have had just too many gardeners, including some with a bent toward the thorns and thistles, as well as those who wanted just vines and trees.
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
Over the past decade, Burma has gone from being an antidemocratic embarrassment and humanitarian disaster to being a serious threat to its neighbors' security. The international community must change its approach to the country's junta.
Beijing has recently stepped back from its unconditional support for pariah states, such as Burma, North Korea, and Sudan. This means China may now be more likely to help the West manage the problems such states pose -- but only up to a point, because at heart China still favors nonintervention as a general policy.
Viet Nam has become more than a small country in South- east Asia. It has become a symbol of a new kind of American involvement in world affairs and a focus for intense and bitter divisions throughout every facet of American society. Few issues have produced a greater flow of books, articles, speeches, journalism and TV reports and commentaries. This stream of words has been devoted almost exclusively to two subjects: the conduct of the war, with speculations about appropriate military strategy and prospects, and the political and moral issues of the position of the United States and its allies. Whether the people of Viet Nam prosper or become permanent economic and political cripples or dependents, and how they may construct a viable nation after the fighting ceases, are issues that are rarely discussed. Yet the answers to such questions may determine the future even more than the direct outcome of the war itself. Whether the sacrifice of lives and treasure has been wasted, what lies ahead for Southeast Asia as a region, and indeed, the future standing and influence of the United States in the Pacific Basin will depend largely on the skill-or lack of it-with which the postwar economic development and reconstruction of Viet Nam, both South and North, are planned and carried out.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.