A Year of Travail: The United States and the International Economy
While the stridency that has increasingly characterized North-South economic relations was somewhat muted in 1978, the tensions that have troubled economic relations between the industrialized nations in recent years were sharpened. This increase in tensions was largely a spillover into the international arena of unresolved problems of domestic economic management. Slow growth, sluggish investment and persistently high rates of unemployment and excess productive capacity continued in most major industrialized countries; only the United States sustained its recovery pace of growth from the sharp recession of 1974-75.
Marina v. N. Whitman is Distinguished Public Service Professor of Economics at the University of Pittsburgh, currently on leave as a Fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, in Stanford. She was a member of the President's Council of Economic Advisers in 1972-73, and is the author of a forthcoming volume, Reflections of Interdependence, and other works.
While the stridency that has increasingly characterized North-South economic relations was somewhat muted in 1978, the tensions that have troubled economic relations between the industrialized nations in recent years were sharpened. This increase in tensions was largely a spillover into the international arena of unresolved problems of domestic economic management. Slow growth, sluggish investment and persistently high rates of unemployment and excess productive capacity continued in most major industrialized countries; only the United States sustained its recovery pace of growth from the sharp recession of 1974-75. As regards inflation, the shoe was on the other foot; in most of the advanced economies the rate was declining or relatively stable, while in the United States it accelerated significantly during the course of the year.
The international reflections of these domestic difficulties included reduced world trade growth, an escalating threat of protectionist attitudes and policies, widening payments imbalances, and increasing instability in foreign exchange markets. These last two developments were attributable in large measure to divergent rates of inflation and real growth between the United States on the one hand and other leading industrialized nations - particularly Germany and Japan - on the other.
Two sets of issues were acute during the year. One set involves such "macroeconomic" questions as the coordination of domestic stabilization policies and the operation of the international monetary system, including the exchange-rate regime. In the other or "microeconomic" sphere, especially in trade and commercial policies, measures to restrict or cartelize world trade proliferated even as the year-end deadline facing the multilateral trade negotiations in Geneva drew closer. In both spheres, the rapid increase in economic interdependence of recent years was straining political and institutional structures, both domestic and international, as nations tried to minimize the threat such interdependence posed to national economic autonomy.
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Related
Does the current financial crisis resemble Japan's "lost decade" of the 1990s? It may be even worse, argues Robert Madsen. Not so, replies Richard Katz.
The persistent deficit in the United States' balance of international payments and the continuing loss of gold have led to increasing discussion of national policies relating to gold and the dollar. While the issues involved are quite technical and complex, they are important to the future of the nation and the world. Broader understanding of the forces impinging on the nation's balance of payments is essential if the United States is to react properly to the changes in its role in the world economy.
The United States is addicted to dollar devaluation. As a result, America has a false, euphoric sense of progress in its competition with Japan for key markets.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.