Making the All-Volunteer Force Work: A National Service Approach
Article Summary and Author Biography
Since January 1973 the United States has sought to accomplish what it has never attempted before--to maintain an active-duty military force of over two million, along with an expanded reserve system, on a strictly voluntary basis. The effort has met with mixed reviews; in the nearly nine years since conscription ended, the All-Volunteer Force has been analyzed, attacked and defended in a seemingly endless series of books, reports, articles and congressional hearings. While the factual outlines of the AVF's performance are fairly clear, there is sharp disagreement regarding both its progress and potential as a tool of national defense. On one side, there are those who believe that the AVF is a success which requires only incremental changes in management policies and recruitment incentives to be fully effective. On the other, there are those who view the program as a costly failure, and see little prospect of a viable defense without some form of compulsory military service.
Charles C. Moskos is Professor of Sociology at Northwestern University. During 1980-81 he was a Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, where an early version of this article was written. He is the author of The American Enlisted Man and Peace Soldiers, and editor of Public Opinion and the Military Establishment. The present article has been adapted from a paper prepared by the author for the 60th American Assembly, on "Military Service in the United States," being held on September 17-20, 1981, at Seven Springs Center in Mount Kisco, New York. The paper will appear in a book, Military Service in the United States, to be published for the Assembly by Prentice-Hall in early 1982. Copyright (c) 1981 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
We're sorry, but Foreign Affairs does not have the copyright to display this article online.
