Home › Features › Essays › European Self-Reliance and the Reform of NATO

European Self-Reliance and the Reform of NATO

By Hedley Bull
Spring 1983
Article Summary and Author Biography

The security of Western Europe requires us to explore a radically new line of policy to which, in the present debate about this subject, little attention has so far been paid.

Hedley Bull has been Montague Burton Professor of International Relations at Oxford since 1977, and before that was for ten years Professor of International Relations at the Australian National University. He is the author of The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, The Control of the Arms Race, and other works. Some of the material in this article also appears in "Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Sept.-Dec., 1982. Copyright (c) 1983 by The Atlantic Quarterly (London).

We're sorry, but Foreign Affairs does not have the copyright to display this article online.

Related

Review Essay, May/Jun 1998
After the Vultures: Holbrooke's Bosnia Peace Came Too Late
Roger Cohen

Richard Holbrooke's gripping memoir shows how he improvised a makeshift peace in what was left of Bosnia despite a timorous Pentagon, a reluctant president, waweirding allies, and brutal ethnic cleansers. But the Dayton Accord came too late.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 1999
NATO's Success in Kosovo
Javier Solana

The NATO war in Kosovo did not come out of the blue. The alliance fought only after Belgrade turned a deaf ear to diplomacy, and NATO knew the risks it was running. But doing nothing would have been worse; assenting to Slobodan Milosevic's mass killings would have dangerously undermined the credibility of Western institutions.

Read
Essay, May/Jun 2001
Europe, the Necessary Partner
William Wallace

In many areas, transatlantic cooperation is stronger than ever before. Yet the common perception is of an increasingly fraught relationship, as evidenced by the well-known disputes over beef, bananas, and burden sharing. Assumptions are diverging over security risks and cultural values. Each side criticizes the other's unwieldy policymaking process without admitting its own shortcomings, while leaders pander to domestic interests and prejudices without educating voters on international issues. Europe nonetheless remains indispensable to a multilateral U.S. foreign policy. The Bush administration must acknowledge the European Union as a true partner, in political and military matters as well as in economics. America cannot expect its allies to share the burdens of global leadership without allowing them their say in the issues at stake.

Read