Government Violence and Repression: An Agenda for Research
In this book, written by social scientists for social scientists and building on an earlier volume, The State as Terrorist, the authors spend much of their energies in establishing definitions, classifications and theories to fit the multifarious phenomena of "state terrorism." One enlightening chapter shows how "national security ideology" has become the rationale for terror and repression in Latin America. Another and certainly controversial chapter compares the records of the United States and the Soviet Union on various forms of state terrorism-and here one catches the "anti-imperialist" tone of much of the book-to the definite disadvantage of the U.S. There are indeed in this "agenda" many judgments, explicit or tacit, interspersed among the definitions and theories.
Related
The U.S. military's new counterinsurgency manual is an overdue step forward in doctrine. But a look back at the history of counterinsurgency offers a sobering reminder of how low the odds of success are -- as Iraq is showing all too well.
The Bush administration has done little to contain the spread of weapons of mass destruction, even as undeterrable nonstate actors grow more intent on obtaining and using them. U.S. counterproliferation policy needs an overhaul. Its new goals should be to get nuclear material out of circulation, reinforce nonproliferation agreements, and use new technologies and invasive monitoring to get better and more actionable intelligence.
Although terrorism is a top U.S. concern, the State Department's annual terrorism report was riddled with errors. If Washington wants to win the war, it needs to get its facts straight.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.