The Tears of the White Man: Compassion as Contempt
A diatribe against the ideologues of Western guilt, against pious compassion with and exaltation of Third World countries. A French journalist excoriates left-wing positions, which he once held himself: "My criticism of 'a sense of guilt that ran amok' is above all a criticism of myself." His treatment of a major topic-the rise of a guilty conscience in Europe-turns into a polemic, sometimes against straw men, but Bruckner pleads as well for meeting the "other," for accepting distance as a condition of friendship or understanding. A special preface for the American audience by the translator, William R. Beer, is marred by all manner of errors and oversimplifications. Altogether, a book that by being contemptuous itself misses its own considerable potential.
Related
German history teaches that malice and simplicity have their appeal, that force impresses, and that nothing in the public realm is inevitable. It also proves that democratic reconstruction is possible, even on initially uncongenial ground.
Daniel Goldhagen's book on the Holocaust--condemning the German "eliminationist" mindset toward Jews--has become an international bestseller and a datum in German-American relations. Pity, because it is a simplistic, monocausal, and unhistorical explanation of one of the most complex horrors in history. For Goldhagen, as for the Nazis, Hitler is Germany.
The Afghanistan crisis has dramatized and intensified antecedent changes and strains in the Western alliance. There was unanimous, if separate, condemnation of Soviet aggression, but there were also divergent, and often acrimoniously divergent, assessments of the causes of aggression and the nature of the challenge. The difficulties of orchestrating a common response or of at least preventing a discordant one suggest a new balance of forces within the alliance and a set of divergent interests.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.