The Middle East After the Israeli Invasion of Lebanon
Every few years Professor Freedman plays host to a conference on the Middle East, then edits and publishes the contributions. The quality of the book depends on the authors and on how far they wish to extend themselves. In this case the results are quite good (inter alia, Freedman himself on Soviet policy, Barry Rubin on U.S. policy, Robert Hunter on Western Europe, Rashid Khaladi on the PLO, John Devlin on Syria). That they write much the same things they have written elsewhere does not diminish the value of the book as a useful overview.
Related
If one looks long enough at recent events in Lebanon, one can see emerging the new face of Israel's Begin government, a face markedly different from the first government of Menachem Begin. That first Begin government, which toppled a decaying and increasingly ineffectual Labor Party, had its moderate and restraining elements whose crowning achievement was the Camp David Accords. The then Defense Minister Ezer Weizman, along with Foreign Minister Moshe Dayan, were the reins on Begin's often frightening rhetoric, steering Begin away from the effects of his worst instincts.
The war in Lebanon presented a fundamental challenge for U.S. policy in the Middle East, but also an opportunity -- if Washington can transform the fragile cease-fire into a lasting and comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace settlement.
Damascus did not commission Hezbollah's raid into Israel, but it did see the ensuing crisis as a chance to prove its importance. Western powers should realize that Syria is ready to be part of a regional solution -- as long as its own interests are recognized.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.