Congress and the President are at odds over arms control policy. This goes to the heart of the constitution, which states that the President alone is empowered to conduct foreign policy, though all foreign policy has domestic inputs and implications. Favours congressional debate and ratification of foreign policy, and outlines its principles for arms control (1) to enhance US security (2) to prevent an uncontrollable arms race (3) to promote mutual deterrence (4) to ensure technological reliability of weapons. With these principles in mind, Congress imposed five amendments to the DoD's FY 87 bill (1) 1+ kt test ban (2) SDI limits (3) SALT II limits (4) ASAT test ban (5) chemical weapon procurement ban. Urges a presidential-congressional consensus on deep cuts, a test ban, SDI research and adherence to the ABM treaty, SALT II limits, and a ban on ASAT and chemical weapons.
Dante B. Fascell (D-Fla.) is Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives.
We're sorry, but Foreign Affairs does not have the copyright to display this article online.
Related
The White House's radical new strategy to combat the spread of weapons of mass destruction will likely make the world less secure, not more.
The nuclear threat has been transformed since the end of the Cold War, but Washington's nuclear posture has not changed to meet it. The United States should scale back its arsenal while allowing limited nuclear tests, shaping its nuclear force to bolster nonproliferation without undermining deterrence.
Despite its widespread public approval and strong White House support, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty was voted down by the U.S. Senate in October 1999. How this happened is a story at once highly predictable and totally surprising, a story, for good or ill, of democracy at work in foreign affairs.
