Recounts the history of ideology in the USSR since 1918, claiming that "seventy years after the Bolshevik revolution, ideology in the USSR has reached its nadir". Marxism-Leninism has failed to describe either national or international reality. "The Soviet regime has lost its ideological legitimacy". Outlines three ideological alternatives for the future (1) success of Gorbachev's policies (2) Russian nationalism (3) neo-Stalinism.
Wolfgang Leonhard was educated in the Soviet Union (1935-45), is Adjunct Professor of History at Yale University, and is the author, most recently, of The Kremlin and the West: A Realistic Approach (1986). Copyright © 1987 by Wolfgang Leonhard.
We're sorry, but Foreign Affairs does not have the copyright to display this article online.
Related
Reprints extracts of an article first published in the Apr 1951 issue of FA, after the Korean invasion had intensified the Cold War, which prophetically described the possible characteristics of a post-Soviet Russia, of which US foreign policy-makers ought to be cognizant. The reprint does not make clear where the 'cuts' have been made.
Describing American neoconservatism as a branch of Cold War liberalism, John Ehrman's new study overlooks the Trotskyist roots and missionary mentality that prolonged and escalated the Cold War.
Examines the challenges now facing the Russian people after the collapse of communism, in terms of the calamitous loss of entire generations of a free-thinking intelligentsia, first the 'bourgeois', then the Marxist -- a loss which now deprives them of the patience, understanding and articulateness needed to establish and secure democratic rule. Western help should be not merely financial, but intellectual and cultural. To be read with this author's 1947 forecast, under the pseudonym 'X', of the reasons and character of the collapse of communism. The analysis of the 'calamity' of Stalinism acknowledges a debt to Robert W Tucker 'Stalin in power: the revolution from above' (WW Norton, 1990).
