Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › The Strategic Defense Initiative: Shield Or Snare; Star Wars: The Economic Fallout; Strategic Defense and Arms Control; Star Wars and European Defence

The Strategic Defense Initiative: Shield Or Snare; Star Wars: The Economic Fallout; Strategic Defense and Arms Control; Star Wars and European Defence

Edited by Harold Brown
Edited by Rosy Nimroody
Edited by Alvin M. Weinberg and Jack N. Barkenbus
Edited by Hans Gunter Brauch
Reviewed by By William P. Bundy
Spring 1988
Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.
Edited by Harold Brown
Westview Press
1987
297 pp.
$24.95
Edited by Rosy Nimroody
Ballinger
1988
234 pp.
Edited by Alvin M. Weinberg and Jack N. Barkenbus
Paragon House
1988
263 pp.
$24.95
Edited by Hans Gunter Brauch
St. Martin's
1987
599 pp.
$39.95

For anyone who has missed the SDI debate and wants to catch up, the Brown volume is a useful primer. In their careful chapter on the macroeconomics of SDI, Barry Blechman and Victor Utgoff estimate the opportunity cost of a comprehensive defense as equivalent to a $570 annual tax surcharge for citizens earning $30,000 to $50,000. The Nimroody book, the result of a Council on Economic Priorities project, presents a still sharper conclusion, arguing that the Reagan SDI program "harbors . . . serious threats to the economy," especially if early contracts build political momentum behind the program. Weinberg and Barkenbus make clear their moral preference for a defense-dominated nuclear world-specifically for a defense-protected arms build-down-but they are fair-minded enough to report their surprise that not all their contributors agreed; indeed their own epilogue is as good a synthesis of the defense-offense arguments as there is anywhere. The Brauch volume disaggregates the European reaction to SDI in country-by-country chapters-helpful source material, if probably more than most readers will need.

Related

Essay, Nov/Dec 1998
Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger
Ashton B. Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow

The specter of weapons of mass destruction being used against America looms larger today than at any time since the Cuban missile crisis. The World Trade Center bombing scarcely hints at the enormity of the danger. America is prepared only for conventional terrorism, not a nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons catastrophe. With the right approach and organization, however, the United States can be ready. Herewith a plan to reorganize the U.S. government to ensure that it can handle the threats of the next century.

Read
Essay, May/Jun 1999
Getting It Backward on Iraq
F. Gregory Gause III

The Clinton administration supports crippling economic sanctions that punish the Iraqi people but seems ready to live with the demise of international inspections to monitor Saddam Hussein's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs. Washington has it exactly backward. It should offer Baghdad a blunt trade: lightened sanctions in return for renewed, intrusive arms inspections. The sweeping sanctions regime does nothing to advance U.S. interests, undermine Saddam, or contain Iraq. Leaving Saddam's arsenal unwatched is folly. Better to have arms inspections without sanctions than sanctions without arms inspections.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 1998
The Testing of American Foreign Policy
Madeleine K. Albright

After the Cold War, the demands on American leadership are no less stern than they were in Dean Acheson's day. Present again at the creation, U.S. diplomacy must pass a series of tests -- of vision, pragmatism, spine, and principle -- to build a foundation for a new world. This will mean encouraging democracy, stopping the spread of weapons of mass destruction, working to shore up the international financial system, engaging Beijing, and standing up to Baghdad and Belgrade. But America needs resources to lead, and Congress has foreign policy living hand-to-mouth. America cannot afford to abdicate its world role.

Read