Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › Human Rights And U.S. Foreign Policy: Congress Reconsidered

Human Rights And U.S. Foreign Policy: Congress Reconsidered

David P. Forsythe
Reviewed by By John C. Campbell
Summer 1988
Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.
David P. Forsythe
University Presses of Florida
1988
236 pp.
$24.00

The issue of human rights considerations in foreign policy is too often debated in terms of Carter versus Reagan. This excellent, information-backed study reminds us of the initiating role of Congress. Mr. Forsythe describes congressional weakness in following up human rights legislation, but concludes that "relative to the other views of human rights that competed in U.S. foreign policy from 1973 to 1984, Congress has not done too badly."

Related

Essay, Winter 1992
The Population Threat
Michael S. Teitelbaum

When the global rate of population growth accelerated and reached an all-time high in the 1960s, the United States established foreign population assistance. In the 1980s, as ideological forces came into play, Washington reversed its position and forfeited its commanding role. The United States needs now to recapture its leadership role on population issues; a "continuation of this self-inflicted blindness to demographic insights is increasingly dangerous for U.S. foreign policy.

Read
Essay, Sep/Oct 2000
Redesigning Foreign Aid
Carol Lancaster

The traditional goals of U.S. foreign aid -- promoting U.S. security and fostering development in poor countries -- are no longer as pressing after the Cold War. Washington must revamp its approach to aid and address new, urgent priorities: shoring up peacekeeping efforts in such places as the Middle East and the Balkans; easing the transition to globalization; tackling transnational environmental crises and diseases; and improving the quality of life for the world's neediest. This new diplomacy will not only transform U.S. aid but bolster its relevance to American interests and values in a rapidly changing world.

Read
Essay, Mar/Apr 2000
Campaign 2000: New World, New Deal: A Democratic Approach to Globalization
W. Bowman Cutter, Joan Spero, and Laura D'Andrea Tyson

The next Democratic president should build on Bill Clinton's legacy of embracing globalization and easing its downsides. This means developing a new system of global economic relations based on American leadership, open markets, engagement with China and other emerging markets, and stronger multilateral regimes to handle transnational challenges such as the environment, labor rights, and the information economy. A new world will need a global New Deal.

Read