The U.S. Press And Iran: Foreign Policy And The Journalism Of Deference
A review of press coverage of Iranian events from the Mossadeq period to the revolution of 1978. The authors find it seriously deficient in comprehending Iran's political culture and the nature of the shah's regime, and they deplore the failure of the press, its views warped by ideology and deference to the establishment, to counter the equally deficient official assessments. The research is carefully done, but the argument as to what American journalists can and should know, and what the obligations of the media are for sound foreign policy, is overblown.
Related
Nearly a quarter-century after the revolution, economic failure and a bankrupt ideology have discredited the Islamic Republic. Despite the attention paid to a clash between "reformers" and "conservatives" in the government, the real story in Iran is the growing discontent among the generation born after 1979. This "Third Force" will eventually topple the regime, and the United States should just watch and wait.
So far, the Bush administration has shown it would like to resolve its problems with North Korea and Iran the same way it did with Iraq: through regime change. It is easy to see why. But the strategy is unlikely to work, at least not quickly enough. A much broader approach -- involving talks, sanctions, and the threat of force -- is needed.
Both in public and underground, Iranians are debating the legitimacy of the Islamic state that Khomeini built. Students challenge the notion that Islam has all the answers but evince pride in an Iran free of the shah and under no foreign master. The religious and secular elites are increasingly willing to contemplate pluralism and openness to the world, though most makers of the revolution remain obdurate and appeal to anti-Americanism to stir up the masses. Washington needs to listen to the new voices of Iran.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.