Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › United Nations, Divided World

United Nations, Divided World

Edited by Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury
Reviewed by By John C. Campbell
Winter 1988/89
Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.
Edited by Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury
Clarendon Press/Oxford
1988
287 pp.
$59.00

At a time when many long-standing international conflicts seem to be winding down and prospects for the United Nations seem more promising, publication of these lectures, given at Oxford in 1986 when the organization's fortunes were at a low point, can help show the way to a more useful role. The authors, all of whom speak from extensive personal experience and with full understanding of the U.N.'s limitations, include Secretary General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, Sir Anthony Parsons, Maurice Bertrand and Evan Luard.

Related

Comment, Summer 1993
Reining in the U.N.: Mistaking the Instrument for the Actor
Ernest W. Lefever

The United Nations is only an instrument of sovereign states occasionally useful in specific crises. When used hastily or inappropriately, it risks internationalizing and prolonging local conflicts.

Read
Essay, Winter 1992
Empowering the United Nations
Boutros Boutros-Ghali

Seeing an historical opportunity to strengthen the United Nations, the Secretary General calls for a number of changes in the world body. These include a special fund for quick start-ups of peacekeeping operations and standby arrangements for specially trained troops and the relevant equipment for peacekeeping.

Read
Essay, Spring 1991
The U.N. in a New World Order
Bruce Russett and James S. Sutterlin

The UN's need for means of military enforcement was foreseen by the Charter, and the post-Cold War international scene is likely, as the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait showed, to require such means to be available. However, the lack of a standing force means that enforcement has always had to be improvised. However, in cases involving major commitment, such as the Gulf war, such an approach "is not likely to be viable unless the vital interests of one or more major military powers is at risk", a limitation which detracts from the global security missions of the UN. A more promising alternative is to create a system for the provision of forces under contract between member states and the UN. A discussion of the contractual and operational command issues involved in such a proposal.

Read