Preventing World War III: A Realistic Grand Strategy
This readable memoir by an experienced Washingtonian, most recently U.S. ambassador to NATO, is a defense of NATO with side glances at issues elsewhere. The book is neither venturesome nor long on specifics-it calls for more-of-the-same-only-better, stronger conventional defense plus a more coherent arms control strategy-but it is distinguished by Abshire's career-long preoccupation with the public politics of defense. He is optimistic and charitable to almost everyone, even Europeans: "Aggressive Americans like myself typically want to fix things. Europeans often prefer to live with them."
Related
Richard Holbrooke's gripping memoir shows how he improvised a makeshift peace in what was left of Bosnia despite a timorous Pentagon, a reluctant president, waweirding allies, and brutal ethnic cleansers. But the Dayton Accord came too late.
William Shawcross shows how U.N. peacekeeping has failed but does not draw the obvious conclusion: the world's hot spots need U.S. intervention, and plenty of it.
We are four Americans who have been concerned over many years with the relation between nuclear weapons and the peace and freedom of the members of the Atlantic Alliance. Having learned that each of us separately has been coming to hold new views on this hard but vital question, we decided to see how far our thoughts, and the lessons of our varied experiences, could be put together; the essay that follows is the result. It argues that a new policy can bring great benefits, but it aims to start a discussion, not to end it.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.