Linkage Or Bondage: U.S. Economic Relations With The ASEAN Region
"Given the present conditions, it seems unlikely that ASEAN as a regional organization can assist the process of national development." Nevertheless, say these two specialists in southeast Asia, the United States ought to be more responsive to the problems of the region, even if many have to be dealt with bilaterally. They are none too hopeful about what this country will do and provide a cooler assessment of the data than one often finds in the discussion of these issues.
Related
US hostility against Japan stems not from any specific arguments about the trade deficit, or direct investment, or burden-sharing, but from an national loss of self-confidence about economic competitiveness.
No, it is not a silly question -- merely one that is not asked often enough. Odd as it may seem, the country that is home to a fifth of humankind is consistently overrated as an economy, a world power, and a source of ideas. Economically, China is a relatively unimportant small market; militarily, it is less a global rival like the Soviet Union than a regional menace like Iraq; and politically, its influence is puny. The Middle Kingdom is a middle power. China matters far less than it and most of the West think, and it is high time the West began treating it as such.
For over half a century Japan and Germany have been at the heart of America's international preoccupations. After a long and destructive war against both countries, the United States worked exhaustively to help its two erstwhile enemies recover and build democratic societies secure under the American defense umbrella. From the late 1960s to the mid-1980s, victor and vanquished moved to a more balanced relationship, especially in trade and finance. Today, in one of history's great role reversals, Tokyo and Bonn have become Washington's fierce trading rivals and also its primary bankers.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.