The Press, Presidents, And Crises
This is a meticulous content analysis of how The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Chicago Tribune reported and editorialized on presidential performance during six crises between 1962 and 1983: the Cuban missile crisis, the American invasion of the Dominican Republic, the Detroit riots, Three-Mile Island, the attempted assassination of President Reagan and the U.S. invasion of Grenada. The author concludes that these papers participated in supportive "rally round the flag" phenomena and that there was some connection between editorial positions and news reporting. The press was not in any sense out to get the president in any of these instances, White House delusions notwithstanding.
Related
In his history of the Council on Foreign Relations, Peter Grose conveys the broad-minded spirit of the undertaking, then the bittersweet broadening of an institution after Vietnam fractured the consensus.
A divided, decentralized government and a hostile media -- especially cable TV and the Internet -- have hamstrung the presidency, just when the world needs U.S. leadership.
The Bush administration may dismiss the relevance of soft power, but it does so at great peril. Success in the war on terrorism depends on Washington's capacity to persuade others without force, and that capacity is in dangerous decline.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.