The Competitive Advantage Of Nations
Building on his earlier work on competitiveness and aided by a study of a hundred companies in ten countries, this Harvard Business School professor undertakes to replace old views of comparative advantage with new explanations of what makes for success in global competition. Although he thinks governmental action can be of only modest help, he finds that the growth of national economies is important, especially in providing strong home demand for the right products, clusters of supporting industries and education tailored to specific needs. As the combinations differ from country to country, his national studies are of special interest. He stresses the importance of competition and warns against too much cooperation among businessmen. His bill of particulars for the United States differs from that of many business groups, especially when he speaks against pooled research and development, the spread of mergers and acquisitions, and protection from foreign competition (except as a means of opening foreign markets).
Related
The 1930s deserve their bad reputation. Unemployment, misery, for many people hunger and, for more, the lack of hope, went with all the other ills of the Great Depression. Then Hitler came to power and fascism around the world grew stronger. The invasions of China by Japan and Ethiopia by Italy, and the Franco rebellion in Spain that soon came to be seen as a kind of global civil war--all showed the way the world was going. Driven by economic pressures, the policies of democratic countries became more narrowly nationalistic; bilateral and preferential trade agreements increased and France, Britain and Holland did what they could to assert privileged positions in their colonies. Although the Soviet Union was hardly a worker's paradise, the very fact that it offered an alternative to collapsed capitalism stirred people's interest and the Kremlin had new cards to play with. The worried democracies, meanwhile, did little to check the rising strength of fascism and were led to make one concession after another. If the times had any redeeming feature, it was that they made people think.
A look back at perhaps the most important foreign policy success of the postwar period. Edited by Peter Grose, with contributions by historians Diane B. Kunz and David Reynolds, a memoir by Charles P. Kindleberger, a profile of Marshall and Acheson by James Chace and one of Will Clayton by Gregory Fossedal and Bill Mikhail. And reflections from Roy Jenkins, Walt Rostow, and Helmut Schmidt.
A look back at perhaps the most important foreign policy success of the postwar period. Edited by Peter Grose, with contributions by historians Diane B. Kunz and David Reynolds, a memoir by Charles P. Kindleberger, a profile of Marshall and Acheson by James Chace and one of Will Clayton by Gregory Fossedal and Bill Mikhail. And reflections from Roy Jenkins, Walt Rostow, and Helmut Schmidt.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.