Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › Cooperation For International Development: The United States And The Third World In The 1990s

Cooperation For International Development: The United States And The Third World In The 1990s

Edited by Robert J. Berg and David F. Gordon
Reviewed by By William Diebold, Jr.
Fall 1990
Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.
Edited by Robert J. Berg and David F. Gordon
Lynne Rienner
1989
356 pp.

Conferences based on extensive studies marked both the years when Americans had confidence (which proved to be misplaced) in their ability to help decisively in bringing about economic development and the longer period since of unease about the relations between rich and poor countries. That the same procedure will continue is suggested by this good collection of papers that stress mostly what is new, including shifts in American foreign relations, cooperation in pursuit of mutual objectives instead of aid, and the need for developing countries to concern themselves with food, cities and the environment.

Related

Essay, Summer 1989
The New Phase in U.S.-Pakistani Relations
Thomas P. Thornton

The two key issues are development aid levels and Pakistan's nuclear policy. On the first, argues that the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, plus US budget constraints, indicate that "extraordinarily high levels of aid cannot and should not be maintained". On the second, asserts that the USA should, if it proves unable to persuade Pakistan to renounce its nuclear programme, lower its sights and settle for Pakistani agreement not to test nuclear weapons.

Read
Essay, Summer 1988
Arms, Aid and the Superpowers
Stephanie G. Newman

Despite a decline in share (from 85% in the 1960s to 68% now) the superpowers still dominate international arms transfers. If they choose not to sell to a combatant, he is forced into the black or grey market, which offers less advanced systems. Combatants are also affected by human factors, economic constraints, the need for large fast deliveries which only the superpowers can meet -- which is also true of satellite intelligence. Dependency is sustained by the need for modern, major systems, access to technological innovation and the need for support (financial, military, political). Explains how military aid has been a useful foreign policy tool.

Read
Essay, Oct 1964
KOREA'S "MENDICANT MENTALITY"?
Pyong Choon Hahm

NOT long ago, at a social gathering, I overheard a high-ranking U.S. military officer berating the Korean people for their "mendicant mentality." He was deeply annoyed by the inability of the Koreans to find a way to live independently, without always looking to the United States for financial help. He did not see how the American taxpayers could be made to carry indefinitely the burden of helping a poor nation that seems unable or unwilling to help itself. He cited the billions of dollars of American aid that have been poured into Korea since 1945. If this has not made the Koreans self-supporting by now, could there ever be an end to American almsgiving? The Koreans must be made to realize, he said, that they had to get onto their own feet very soon; otherwise continued American aid would only create what one American news magazine several years ago termed a "handout mentality."

Read