The Asian-Pacific Rim: Success at a Pace
Summarizes regional developments which affected US interests during 1990 (1) imminent closure of US bases in the Philippines, seen as unlikely to harm US regional interests and more likely to damage the Philippine economy (2) the change in US policy on Cambodia, and preparation for normalization of relations with Vietnam (3) changes in Soviet policy towards the APR, to the disadvantage of Vietnam and North Korea (4) the more gradual evolution of China's foreign policy (5) the troubled course of US-Japanese relations.
Bernard K. Gordon is Professor of Political Science at the University of New Hampshire. His most recent book, New Directions for American Policy in Asia, was published in October.
America's motto in the Pacific in 1990 could have been: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The region remains America's largest export market ($21 billion larger than Europe in 1989), and its politics represents much of what the United States has long sought: healthy nationalism, pluralism and even democracy in places where not long ago there was mainly military-led authoritarianism and, finally, the absence of any single dominant nation.
Such an environment does not call for major new U.S. initiatives. Instead Washington needs to encourage East Asia's many favorable trends and dampen the few others that could undermine progress. The one exception where the United States did initiate important new steps in 1990 was in Southeast Asia-involving the American presence in the Philippines and a more substantial policy shift in Indochina.
II
The Philippines issue concerns U.S. bases, principally at Subic Bay Naval Station and Clark Air Force Base. Agreements on these installations expire in 1991, and the renewal negotiations have not gone well. President Corazon Aquino's administration is divided on the issue, and despite many years of nationalist campaigns against the bases Philippine public opinion remains decidedly in favor. One poll reported as much as 80 percent for retention, a higher figure than previous polls; this support probably reflects a growing realization of how much the economy will lose if the Americans leave. Twenty-two thousand Filipinos work at the air force base alone, and the Philippine economy, with a $26 billion foreign debt, remains desperate.
Manila's problem is compounded by its partners in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, who believe Aquino and her foreign secretary have missed opportunities to develop broader support for the bases, especially in an ASEAN context. They regard the bases as important for regional stability and are not anxious for an American departure. In that environment Manila's negotiating position has not been strong, while the American side has clearly concluded that if it has to leave the main losers will be Filipinos.
This is a premium article
You must be a Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you are already a print subscriber, click here to activate your online access.
Log In
Related
Reviews the US debate between those favouring constructive engagement and those calling for China's censure and isolation on account of human rights abuses. US policy-makers should seek to extend economic ties while also speaking frankly on human rights issues -- it is impolitic to make the former conditional on the latter.
Considers prospects for a long-overdue revision of US policy towards Vietnam. The UN policy to resolve the Cambodian conflict is quixotic, and now that the USSR has withdrawn as a regional power, there exists a strategic vacuum which the USA can move to fill.
Reviews the dominant features of the APR (Asia-Pacific region). "The major strategic issue is still the USSR. It is unclear how the United States should cope with the remaining, and in some respects growing, Soviet military capability in the Asian-Pacific area"; it therefore behoves the USA to maintain its strong naval presence in the APR, while exploring naval arms reduction with the Soviets. In addition, the USA should preserve its commitment to South Korea (while encouraging rapprochement between North and South Korea), and retain close security ties with Japan. Regional security co-operation should be encouraged in SE Asia, though not over-optimistically: "Southeast Asians are likely to favor a US presence for some time to come". As for the unpredictable regional policy of China, the US objective should be to promote political and economic links which maximize China's co-operation with its neighbours, as well as with the USA.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.