China's Participation In The Imf, The World Bank, And Gatt
This pathbreaking collaborative effort probes the implications of China's membership in the IMF and the World Bank and its possible full participation in GATT. The authors conclude that the contacts between China's leaders and fund and bank officials, coupled with the influence of Western economists, altered the perceptions of many Chinese leaders about the world economy and China's economic performance. Standards of evaluation derived from Western economic theory replaced concepts imported in the 1950s from the Soviet Union. Membership in the World Bank and IMF also provided valuable new perspectives to the Chinese on the development process and the strategies available to them. The study is rich in both theoretical and policy insights, and it has many implications for the Soviet Union, Vietnam and other communist countries who might eventually join the keystone international economic organizations. It should be read carefully by the U.S. policy community now rethinking American global strategy in a changed international environment.
Related
The global financial turmoil that began in Thailand in 1997 has forced the international community to reevaluate the institutions, structures, and policies aimed at crisis prevention and resolution. In September 1998 President Clinton suggested that a distinguished private-sector group assess the need for reform of the international financial architecture. With this concern in mind, the Council on Foreign Relations sponsored the Independent Task Force on the Future of the International Financial Architecture, cochaired by Peter G. Peterson, chairman of both the Council and the Blackstone Group and secretary of commerce during the Nixon administration, and Carla A. Hills, CEO of Hills & Co. and U.S. Trade Representative during the Bush administration.
Initially devised to maintain a system of fixed exchange rates, the IMF took on a new role during the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s-providing moderate amounts of credit, facilitating debt renegotiations, and recommending responsible macroeconomic policies. But the IMF is also applying the lessons of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, where a fundamental economic restructuring was necessary, to Asia. So in Korea, for example, the fund called for reform of inefficient conglomerates and inflexible labor laws. However beneficial in the long run, such changes are not needed to resolve the current crisis. By stepping in too far and too soon, the IMF discourages countries from seeking modest help. Even worse, it encourages bankers to undertake more risky loans, making another crisis more likely.
Does the current financial crisis resemble Japan's "lost decade" of the 1990s? It may be even worse, argues Robert Madsen. Not so, replies Richard Katz.
