Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › European Security In The 1990s: Deterrence And Defense After The Inf Treaty

European Security In The 1990s: Deterrence And Defense After The Inf Treaty

Walter Laqueur and Leon Sloss
Reviewed by Gregory F. Treverton
Summer 1991
European Security In The 1990s: Deterrence And Defense After The Inf Treaty
Walter Laqueur and Leon Sloss
Plenum Press
1990
214 pp.
$30.00
Login or Register to leave a comment.

If this is the answer, what's the question? Readers wouldn't bother to find out except for the authors: Laqueur a distinguished scholar and Sloss an experienced former government official. Their book, a product of Los Alamos Laboratory's Center for National Security Studies, is a brief but thoughtful sweep across NATO's nuclear predicament; the other half of the book is useful source material. Their conclusion: there are military grounds but precious little political support for modernizing NATO's nuclear arsenal in Europe.

Related

Essay, Jan 1963
Nuclear Policy and French Intransigence
Malcolm W. Hoag

Our refusal to aid France in developing her nuclear strike force has never lacked American critics. Should we not seek an accommodation with General de Gaulle, trading missile technology and components for coöperation in another military or political field? Increasingly, it is said that we should. Proponents argue that France is well on the road toward acquiring her force de frappe, despite our opposition which has embittered French officials and made their program slower and more expensive. The bitterness and higher cost leave France both less willing and less able to support common enterprises, including the provision of modern French divisions to NATO and toleration of American-controlled nuclear weapons on her territory. It is said that these are unpleasant consequences of American policy, especially as they are felt by one honored major ally and not another. If we should supply Skybolt missiles to the United Kingdom for its Bomber Command, should we not assist France in some comparable way? Especially if France pays for it and eases our troubled balance of payments?

Read
Essay, Jan 1971
Nuclear Diplomacy: Britain, France and America
Andrew J. Pierre

The Atlantic nations are moving toward a new security relationship which may in time involve the role of European strategic nuclear forces. We are in a period of widespread questioning of the nature of future American participation in the defense of Western Europe. In the squalor of American cities, the increased racial and social tensions of our society and the demands for a shift in national priorities away from defense toward domestic problems lie the seeds of change. If we add to these the economic recovery of Europe, the U.S. view that the allies are not carrying a fair share of their own defense, the balance-of-payments deficit toward which the U.S. forces abroad make a substantial contribution, the squeeze on the Pentagon budget, the tendency resulting from the traumatic experience in Vietnam to shed responsibilities, we find the ingredients of a reduced U.S. military involvement in Europe.

Read
Essay, Jul 1964
Coalition Diplomacy in a Nuclear Age
Henry A. Kissinger

For several years now disputes have rent the Atlantic Alliance. They have focused on such issues as nuclear strategy and control, the organization of Europe and the nature of an Atlantic Community. However, the most fundamental issue in Atlantic relationships is raised by two questions not unlike those which each Western society has had to deal with in its domestic affairs: How much unity do we want? How much pluralism can we stand? Too formalistic a conception of unity risks destroying the political will of the members of the Community. Too absolute an insistence on national particularity must lead to a fragmentation of the common effort.

Read
Cover image

In the Magazine

November/December 2009, 6, 88
Essay
The Dollar and the Deficits
C. Fred Bergsten

The global economic crisis has revealed the folly of large U.S. budget and trade deficits, as well as of the strong dollar that makes them possible. If it is serious about recovery, the United States must balance the budget, stimulate private saving, and embrace a declining dollar.
Read