The Political Theory Of Swedish Social Democracy
An attractive and wide-ranging monograph that battles two common assumptions: that ideas or moral beliefs matter little in politics and that the success of the Swedish socialist party in retaining power over four decades-a success unique among European socialist parties-can be attributed to its pragmatism or revisionism. The author, an American political scientist, is an enthusiast for Sweden's socialist achievement, untouched by recent skepticism about "the Swedish model." His book explicates the principal ideas of Swedish socialism, from its foundation in the nineteenth century to Olof Palme. The book has some actuality because the Swedish socialists accepted the essential value of the market while seeking ways to make society more egalitarian and equitable. What Gunnar and Alva Myrdal wrote in 1935 still has resonance: "We cannot become poorer by taking better care of our human capital."
Related
The Afghanistan crisis has dramatized and intensified antecedent changes and strains in the Western alliance. There was unanimous, if separate, condemnation of Soviet aggression, but there were also divergent, and often acrimoniously divergent, assessments of the causes of aggression and the nature of the challenge. The difficulties of orchestrating a common response or of at least preventing a discordant one suggest a new balance of forces within the alliance and a set of divergent interests.
After 40 years of division, the two former halves of Germany are discovering the psychological stresses of unity. The collapse of the German Democratic Republic released East Germans from public control and authoritarian intimidation. But with freedom, they are having to learn to make choices and to live with risk and uncertainty. West Germans are resentful at the cost of reunification and arrogant about the sad state of their Eastlander brethren. Both halves of Germany will have to deal with their separate and joint pasts. They should expect moral and psychological unity to take longer than the material recuperation of the east.
There have been three widely separated political Greeces: the ancient city- states, the Byzantine empire and modern Greece, which won its independence from the Turks less than a century and a half ago. In essence, there is little relationship between the governance of these three Greeces but, because of classical influence on contemporary education and because the early Athenians were so gifted in defining and elaborating systems of thought, there is a persistent tendency to regard contemporary Greece in terms of its antique glory. Nowadays above all, when the country is governed by a stolid group of Colonels, it is fashionable to decry dictatorship in the birthplace of democracy.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.