Our Age. English Intellectuals Between The World Wars: A Group Portrait
Lord Annan, a formidable presence in English intellectual and public life, has written a kind of collective autobiography, a record of the beliefs and careers of the men and women-"the educated classes"-who were formed by the great British institutions, most notably Oxford and Cambridge, from the end of the Great War to the end of World War II. The book is indeed a group portrait, with incisive sketches of individuals and splendid summaries of attitudes on matters such as morality and homosexuality, philosophy, science and politics, placed against the background of the great historical upheavals of Britain's postwar years in decline, ending with Thatcherism as the negation of the earlier ethos of "Our Age." Only a writer with a lifetime of reading and listening could have produced a book so full of information, so forcefully erudite, with so many apt quotations, telling quips and perfect examples. It is part gossip, part history and a great mastery of so many facets of our time; altogether impressive, indispensable for a view of Britain since 1945, critical in substance-especially of the British political leadership-and assured yet measured in tone. A retrospective of the greats, written with a sense of their passing from the scene.
Related
German history teaches that malice and simplicity have their appeal, that force impresses, and that nothing in the public realm is inevitable. It also proves that democratic reconstruction is possible, even on initially uncongenial ground.
Daniel Goldhagen's book on the Holocaust--condemning the German "eliminationist" mindset toward Jews--has become an international bestseller and a datum in German-American relations. Pity, because it is a simplistic, monocausal, and unhistorical explanation of one of the most complex horrors in history. For Goldhagen, as for the Nazis, Hitler is Germany.
The Afghanistan crisis has dramatized and intensified antecedent changes and strains in the Western alliance. There was unanimous, if separate, condemnation of Soviet aggression, but there were also divergent, and often acrimoniously divergent, assessments of the causes of aggression and the nature of the challenge. The difficulties of orchestrating a common response or of at least preventing a discordant one suggest a new balance of forces within the alliance and a set of divergent interests.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.