George Bush's War; Mr. Bush's War
The official celebratory explanation of every American war is challenged sooner or later by "revisionist" politicians, commentators and historians. These two books are the first wave of Gulf War revisionism. They both focus on President Bush in the months leading up to the entry of American forces into combat, not on the war itself, and both are unremittingly critical, seeing the president acting for narrow political advantage, misleading public and Congress, and threatening the democratic safeguards against folly that are embedded in the American constitutional process. Smith's book is the more carefully researched; Graubard's the more passionate.
Related
The American century, far from being over, is on the way. The information revolution, which capsized the Soviet Union and propelled Japan to eminence, has altered the equation of national power. America leads the world in the new technologies. Its emerging military systems can thwart any threat. On the "soft-power" side, it projects its ideals and other countries follow. To prevent an information race, America must share its lead; to preserve its reputation, it must keep its house in order.
Although terrorism is a top U.S. concern, the State Department's annual terrorism report was riddled with errors. If Washington wants to win the war, it needs to get its facts straight.
The Bush administration has done little to contain the spread of weapons of mass destruction, even as undeterrable nonstate actors grow more intent on obtaining and using them. U.S. counterproliferation policy needs an overhaul. Its new goals should be to get nuclear material out of circulation, reinforce nonproliferation agreements, and use new technologies and invasive monitoring to get better and more actionable intelligence.
