Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › The U.S.-South Korean Alliance: Time For A Change

The U.S.-South Korean Alliance: Time For A Change

Edited by Doug Bandow and Ted Galen Carpenter
Reviewed by Donald S. Zagoria
Winter 1992/93
The U.S.-South Korean Alliance: Time For A Change
Edited by Doug Bandow and Ted Galen Carpenter
Transaction
1992
228 pp.
$32.95
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.

This volume on U.S. relations with South Korea does have a sharp focus-the merits of maintaining or removing U.S. military forces from Korea. It suffers from being overtaken by the rush of events in Korea and the world, and it fails to discuss in any coherent fashion the nature of U.S. interests in post-Cold War Asia and the type of strategy that would serve those interests, in Korea as well as elsewhere.

Related

Essay, Mar/Apr 1997
Hastening Korean Reunification: The Writing on the 38th Parallel
Nicholas Eberstadt

Pacific powers would like Korea to reunify slowly, but the North is soon likely to implode, its economy deteriorating as its weapons of mass destruction accumulate. Rapid reunification would spur economic growth, as in Germany, and reduce regional tensions. South Korea's liberalization of its own economy and strengthening of its civic institutions will prepare it to assist the North. China and Russia may not go along, but Western governments should stop coddling Pyongyang. America should underwrite a united Korea's security, and Japan its finances.

Read
Essay, Special 1992
Asia/Pacific Challenges
Robert B. Oxnam

The Clinton administration inherits strained bilateral relations with the leading powers of Asia and no coherent policy for the Asia / Pacific region as a whole. Trade, security and diplomatic style are the overarching challenges – and on all three counts prominent Asians are worried. They fear a president bent on building trade walls, bringing home American troops and lecturing on human rights. Yet respect for the United States remains instinctive throughout the region, particularly given convincing progress in rejuvenating the American economy. Asia's quest for economic growth and more democratic government awaits leadership from Washington.

Read
Essay, Winter 1988
Inescapable Entanglements
James Chace

The central concern of US foreign policy -- relations with the USSR -- could be derailed by stakes in lesser countries, namely South Korea, the Philippines, Panama, and some states in Central America. Assesses each 'danger zone', and concludes that Bush cannot "postpone the reckoning ahead".

Read
Cover image

In the Magazine

March/April 2010, 2, 89
Essay
After Iran Gets the Bomb
James M. Lindsay and Ray Takeyh

Despite international pressure, Iran appears to be continuing its march toward getting a nuclear bomb. But Washington can contain and mitigate the consequences of Tehran's nuclear defiance, keeping an abhorrent outcome from becoming a catastrophic one.
Read