Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › Pearl Harbor: Final Judgement

Pearl Harbor: Final Judgement

Henry C. Clausen and Bruce Lee
Reviewed by By Andrew J. Pierre
Spring 1993
Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.
Henry C. Clausen and Bruce Lee
Crown
1992
480 pp.
$25.00

With the nuclear weapons era nearing the five-decade mark, this succinct history of the American approach to nonproliferation is a welcome addition to the arms control bookshelf. Particularly good is the author's ability to identify and describe the inevitable trade-offs between nonproliferation and other goals in the making of foreign policy. The treatment is chronological, all the best source materials have been consulted, and the complex tale is well organized and clearly written. A made-to-order book for university courses.

Related

Essay, Winter 1981
Arms Sales: The New Diplomacy
Andrew J. Pierre

The recent heated debate over the sale of Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) planes and F-15 fighter components to Saudi Arabia was only one of a number of controversies involving U.S. arms sales. The next weapons transfer which will meet congressional resistance is that of F-16 fighters to Pakistan, a sale which some believe will give a renewed impetus to the arms race on the subcontinent and undermine nonproliferation efforts. Serious questions are also being raised about the wisdom of the planned sale of F-16s to Venezuela, thereby crossing a technological threshold which in the past has restrained the transfer of the most advanced fighter aircraft to Latin America. Proposed new arms supply relationships with Argentina, Chile and Guatemala will draw the ire of those who are concerned about the dropping of past restrictions based upon these countries' human rights records. The Reagan Administration is faced with a tough decision regarding the sale of the FX fighter to Taiwan. Beijing has put Washington on notice that it considers the proposed sale as a "litmus test" of future Sino-American relations. But the same type of symbolism is attached to the sale by Taipei, which would view the failure to sell as a sign of abandonment.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 1998
Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger
Ashton B. Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow

The specter of weapons of mass destruction being used against America looms larger today than at any time since the Cuban missile crisis. The World Trade Center bombing scarcely hints at the enormity of the danger. America is prepared only for conventional terrorism, not a nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons catastrophe. With the right approach and organization, however, the United States can be ready. Herewith a plan to reorganize the U.S. government to ensure that it can handle the threats of the next century.

Read
Essay, May/Jun 1999
Getting It Backward on Iraq
F. Gregory Gause III

The Clinton administration supports crippling economic sanctions that punish the Iraqi people but seems ready to live with the demise of international inspections to monitor Saddam Hussein's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs. Washington has it exactly backward. It should offer Baghdad a blunt trade: lightened sanctions in return for renewed, intrusive arms inspections. The sweeping sanctions regime does nothing to advance U.S. interests, undermine Saddam, or contain Iraq. Leaving Saddam's arsenal unwatched is folly. Better to have arms inspections without sanctions than sanctions without arms inspections.

Read