The Political Economy of Foreign Investment in Mexico: Nationalism, Liberalism, Constraints on Choice
This well-documented study, based on extensive interviews and field research, analyzes why Mexico pursued nationalist policies toward foreign investment through the 1970s, made them more extreme during that decade, and then turned so decisively to economic liberalization in the 1980s, welcoming foreign investment and pushing for free trade with the United States. Whiting's answer, sometimes obscured by social science jargon, is that the same global trends toward industrial integration now pushing the United States toward industrial policy and managed trade have shifted constraints within Mexico toward more liberal and internationalist policies. Free trade with the United States, which threatened Mexico's autonomy only a decade ago, is now in Mexico's interest--even if nationalists in the United States object.
Related
Exaggerated claims and charges are obscuring the facts about the North American Free Trade Agreement. Over time, in almost every instance, what's good for Mexico would also be good for the United States.
The Salinas regime has ardently pursued the North American Free Trade Agreement as a silver bullet to kill myriad political and economic problems. But NAFTA as it stands would exacerbate many of Mexico's enduring disparities and injustices. Short term adjustment costs and the possibility of backsliding on political reform have largely been overlooked. NAFTA must be designed to contribute to political reform. Otherwise, postponing the accord would not weaken Mexico-only Salinas.
Survey of US economic problems, from budget deficits to the need for political and economic stability in Mexico.
