The Gulf Conflict, 1990-1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order
Within months of the end of Desert Storm, a flood of instant histories of that war appeared. Now, with a bit more time and perspective, the first of the second wave of books on the Gulf crisis of 1990-91 has appeared. The authors write from an academic perspective, weighing available evidence, reaching conclusions carefully. The result is an excellent overview of the crisis. Readers will find the main outlines of the analysis familiar. This is not a revisionist history, but it does explore a number of "what ifs," usually concluding that alternative outcomes to the crisis were unlikely. Saddam Hussein is seen as driven to invade Kuwait by his insecurity, a questionable interpretation; and the authors seem to downplay the role that Iraqi nuclear developments may have had in convincing the Bush administration to go to war. Still, the book as a whole sets a high standard for what will no doubt be a continuing study of the first post-Cold War crisis.
Related
What should the United States do about Iraq? Hawks are wrong to think the problem is desperately urgent or connected to terrorism, but right to see the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein as so worrisome that it requires drastic action. Doves are right about Iraq's not being a good candidate for an Afghan-style war, but wrong to think that inspections and deterrence alone can contain Saddam. The United States has no choice left but to invade Iraq itself and eliminate the current regime.
The failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has prompted much handwringing over the problems with prewar intelligence. Too little attention has been paid, however, to the flip slide of the picture: that the much-maligned UN-enforced sanctions regime actually worked. Contrary to what critics have said, we now know that containment helped destroy Saddam Hussein's war machine and his capacity to produce weapons.
"The American way of war" refers to the grinding strategy of attrition that U.S. generals traditionally employed to prevail in combat. But that was then. Spurred by dramatic advances in information technology, the new American way of war relies on speed, maneuver, flexibility, and surprise. This approach was put on display in the invasion of Iraq and should reshape what the military looks like.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.