The Passionate Attachment: America's Involvement with Israel, 1947 to the Present
George Ball has been an outspoken critic of Israeli policies toward its Arab neighbors for many years. In this book, coauthored with his son Douglas, he makes his most powerful case to date against the "passionate attachment" of the United States to Israel. The historical overview is thin on the pre-Carter years; Reagan is severely criticized, while Bush is given better marks. Many will find the second part of the book on Israel and on the role of American Jews in American politics to be the most controversial. The authors argue that American support for Israel has been costly--financially, morally and politically. Unlikely to convince those who have already made up their minds on this much-debated topic, this book will be read and discussed because of the eminence of the senior author. More political argument than history, the Balls' analysis is nonetheless carefully documented.
Related
President Reagan's address to the nation on September 1 deftly reengaged the United States in the Arab-Israeli peace process. At long last Washington broke free from the straitjacket of deadlocked autonomy negotiations to declare its intention of vigorously pursuing resolution of basic political issues. The success of this initiative will be tested by the extent to which subsequent political change in Israel and in the Arab world produces foreign policies gradually more conducive to compromise.
Unlike the Carter Administration (with the Brookings Report), the new Administration has not come into office with any known general policy framework of its own for the settlement of the Palestine problem and the Arab-Israeli conflict. In addition to the priority accorded by President Reagan to the domestic economy, the fact that the Israeli elections were to be held on June 30 served to purchase additional time. Nonetheless, the emerging indicators of what the new Administration's policy might be give cause for concern to some observers of the Middle East scene.
The Bush administration's plan for Middle East peace is a road map to nowhere. A more ambitious approach will be necessary to parlay the bounce from a successful Iraq war into serious Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations. The time has come to consider the notion of a trusteeship for Palestine.
