NAFTA: An Assessment
This book describes and evaluates the North American Free Trade Agreement in light of the authors' assessment and recommendations for NAFTA in their North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations, published before conclusion of the negotiations. Professorially, they give the negotiated agreement an overall mark of B+, an average of components that range from C (for safeguards) to A (for agriculture, transportation and dispute settlement). Their work has already helped shape the debate on NAFTA, particularly their plausible finding that during the remainder of the 1990s NAFTA is likely to have a positive effect on employment in the United States, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The reason is simple: with NAFTA, capital-starved Mexico is likely to have an investment boom, run a trade deficit and import many American goods, especially investment goods. Without NAFTA, the Mexican economy will languish and may even have a financial crisis. Of course, some Americans, as well as many Mexicans, will have to adjust to eventual free trade between the two countries. But the adjustments required will be tiny, well under one percent, the size of the adjustments required continually in the U.S. economy by technological change and internal competition. This book offers a clear, cogent and persuasive analysis of a complex and politically charged topic.
Related
California is the most populous state in the United States. Its gross economic product is seventh in the world, well ahead of China or Canada. Given its massive size and the fact that the export-driven sector is the only part of its economy that shows any potential for long-term growth, California is increasingly adopting its own foreign policy. In turn international economic trends are having strong regional effects from San Diego to San Francisco. At the center of this new interdependence lies the North American Free Trade Agreement and the pivotal bilateral tie between Mexico and California.
The Salinas regime has ardently pursued the North American Free Trade Agreement as a silver bullet to kill myriad political and economic problems. But NAFTA as it stands would exacerbate many of Mexico's enduring disparities and injustices. Short term adjustment costs and the possibility of backsliding on political reform have largely been overlooked. NAFTA must be designed to contribute to political reform. Otherwise, postponing the accord would not weaken Mexico-only Salinas.
To the United States, the labor and environmental costs of NAFTA would be minimal and the economic benefits real, but small. The trade agreement is really about helping a friendly and important neighbor in its yet uncompleted economic and political reform.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.