The Iran-Iraq War: The Politics of Aggression
One should not be surprised that a conference held in Tehran in 1988 on the topic of the Iran-Iraq war would result in a stark indictment of Iraqi aggression. What is more surprising is that this collection of essays, many written by Western scholars and Iranians residing in the West, comes close to meeting scholarly standards of discourse. Many of the papers succeed in capturing the Iranian sense of victimization, of having the costly eight-year war imposed on them by Saddam Hussein. Needless to say, there are Iraqi and Arab sides of the story that are not told here, but this collection is at least a start in sketching one side of the story that had a devastating impact on the Middle East and set the stage for Iraq's subsequent aggression against Kuwait.
Related
Yesterday's announcement of a plot to assassinate the Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the United States is just the latest story in the struggle now unfolding between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Whilst Iran has made its three-to-one manpower advantage tell on the ground, it is nonetheless losing the war in the air as well as economically and diplomatically. Iran suffers both from logistical problems (e.g. spares for seven kinds of tank), ineffective doctrine and political control of the military. Iraq has mounted an effective economic blockade of its enemy and with 'de facto' support from both superpowers should defeat Iran within eighteen months. Includes a rationalization of Iraqi use of chemical weapons.
By toppling Saddam Hussein, the Bush administration has liberated and empowered Iraq's Shiite majority and has helped launch a broad Shiite revival that will upset the sectarian balance in Iraq and the Middle East for years to come. This development is rattling some Sunni Arab governments, but for Washington, it could be a chance to build bridges with the region's Shiites, especially in Iran.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.