Scharping responds to Paul Krugman's "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession."
Rudolf Scharping is the Chairman of the Social Democratic Party of Germany.
- previous
- Page 2of 2
- next-disabled
The view that nations compete against each other like big corporations has become pervasive among Western elites, many of whom are in the Clinton administration. As a practical matter, however, the doctrine of "competitiveness" is flatly wrong. The world's leading nations are not, to any important degree, in economic competition with each other. Nor can their major economic woes be attributed to "losing" on world markets. This is particularly true in the case of the United States. Yet Clinton's theorists of competitiveness, from Laura D. Andrea Tyson to Robert Reich to Ira Magaziner, make seemingly sophisticated arguments, most of which are supported by careless arithmetic and sloppy research. Competitiveness is a seductive idea, promising easy answers to complex problems. But the result of this obsession is misallocated resources, trade frictions and bad domestic economic policies.
There are many good reasons for promoting research and development, education and training, as well as technology at the national level to provide for future growth and employment at home. And one country can certainly learn from another how to increase productivity. However aggressive stances are not needed. If Krugman's article leads to a realization among political decision-makers that defining countries primarily as economic competitors is a mistake, it should result in greater international cooperation and policy coordination.
Rules are needed that do not completely preclude but nonetheless restrain unfair competition, among currencies, tax systems, industrial policy interventions as well as environmental and social standards. The world economic summits as well as informal meetings of the Group of Seven industrialized nations should regain the substance that they had in German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt's time. In view of the present global challenge, which all countries face in coping with structural change in a socially acceptable and ecologically sustainable manner, the industrialized nations must cooperate more closely, not only among themselves but with the developing countries.
- previous
- Page 2of 2
- next-disabled
Related
Thurow responds to Paul Krugman's "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession."
Prestowitz responds to Paul Krugman's "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession."
The view that nations compete against each other like big corporations has become pervasive among Western elites, many of whom are in the Clinton administration. As a practical matter, however, the doctrine of "competitiveness" is flatly wrong. The world's leading nations are not, to any important degree, in economic competition with each other. Nor can their major economic woes be attributed to "losing" on world markets. This is particularly true in the case of the United States. Yet Clinton's theorists of competitiveness, from Laura D. Andrea Tyson to Robert Reich to Ira Magaziner, make seemingly sophisticated arguments, most of which are supported by careless arithmetic and sloppy research. Competitiveness is a seductive idea, promising easy answers to complex problems. But the result of this obsession is misallocated resources, trade frictions and bad domestic economic policies.
