Save Public Diplomacy: Broadcasting America's Message Matters
Rash budget cuts threaten to silence Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and other U.S. agencies. Public diplomacy proved invaluable during the Cold War, and it remains an essential weapon against today's new threats.
Walter Laqueur is a historian and the Chairman of the Research Council for the Center for Strategic and International Affairs. He is co-editor of the Journal of Contemporary History and author of several dozen books, including most recently The Dream that Failed: Reflections on the Soviet Union.
Public diplomacy has never been the favorite child of U.S. foreign policy. More often it is considered a poor relation, faintly disreputable, with no particular merits in the past and of doubtful relevance in the present, not to be discarded altogether but kept at a safe distance. However, during the last year the attitudes of influential congressmen have turned from indifference to hostility. Some important United States Information Agency (USIA) programs have been discontinued, others radically scaled down. When the Congress returns from its recess, further cuts can be expected. The attitude of the Clinton administration has been generally apathetic; one of its first initiatives was to phase out the Munich-based radio stations Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. Recently a substantial group of freshman lawmakers spent hours on the House and the Senate floors attempting to kill the National Endowment for Democracy, a small but very effective organization that helps democratic forces in formerly undemocratic countries, the total budget of which ($35 million) is less than the cost of a F-18 jet fighter. The decline in public diplomacy efforts has taken place over a long time; 12,600 people were employed by USIA in 1967; the number now is 8,500 and falling. The number of those stationed abroad has been halved. The agency's budget in real terms is less than it was in 1970. What made legislators accustomed to swallowing camels strain at gnats?
WHY THE STATIC?
There are several explanations, but none of them is entirely convincing, and to some extent the issue remains shrouded in mystery. America, the home of Madison Avenue, pioneered public relations. Advertising, in the widest sense, has always been appreciated in the United States, which spends more for this purpose than any other country. Yet, while America spends huge amounts selling cigarettes and soft drinks, it is not selling America. A single company, Philip Morris, spent more in one year on advertising, $2 billion in 1990, than the combined budgets of all U.S. agencies, official and semiofficial, engaged in public diplomacy.
This is a premium article
You must be a Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you are already a print subscriber, click here to activate your online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
The United States has put legions of spokespersons on the airwaves at home and abroad in a campaign to "win the hearts and minds" of the Muslim world. So far, however, the world's superpower is losing the propaganda war to a terrorist in hiding. This is not surprising, given the virulent anti-Western messages that repressive Middle Eastern regimes spread through state-run media. Washington should focus instead on bringing freedom of the press to those countries where oppression breeds terrorism.
The Bush administration's tone-deaf approach to the Middle East reflects a dangerous misreading of the nature and sources of Arab public opinion. Independent, transnational media outlets have transformed the region, and the administration needs to engage the new Arab public sphere that has emerged.
History's third technological revolution is transforming national sovereignty, the world economy, and the military. The abundance of information challenges state power as more people demand the freedoms they see enjoyed in other parts of the world. Information increasingly replaces territory and material goods as the source of wealth and power. Computers allow simulation of battles and information warfare. The ability to adapt to these advances will determine which institutions and nations survive the coming decades.
