Inflation Overkill: Moving the Fed into a Global Age
The only inflation these days is in the Fed's fear of rising prices. Open global markets will keep prices down. Interest rate hikes will only dampen economic growth. The Fed must unleash the American economy.
James D. Robinson III is President of J. D. Robinson Inc. and former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the American Express Company.
In its zeal to fight inflation, the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates several times this year. America’s central bankers have focused on the usual set of statistics, growth rate, unemployment, industrial capacity. So have most market watchers. Growth is microanalyzed, almost feared. The domestic economic indicators, as they are called, have mesmerized both central banker and bond trader for so long that neither seems to have noticed just how faded the old red flags have become. They have overlooked a far larger and more important trend, a global economy that has fundamentally changed the inflation calculus.
Inflation is not a threat in the United States. Nor is it for the foreseeable future. It has been remarkably flat and will remain so, unless the Fed or the markets begin spurring inflation with higher interest rates. The Fed and most market watchers have undervalued their greatest allies, open, global, and increasingly fluid markets for goods, labor, and services. International competition will tame prices in a broad swath of the U.S. economy. The old domestic indicators, while perhaps important in gauging certain narrow trends, no longer determine the broader inflation outlook.
America’s central bankers, as well as their counterparts abroad, are running economic policy in a global era from a playbook written for a relatively closed national economy. They are fighting the inflation wars of times gone by, and the markets keep cheering them on. Vigilance against inflation is a legitimate aim, but the Fed also has a broader purpose. Its parallel goal must be to ensure the health of all money and capital markets in their depth, breadth, and liquidity. Today, that task requires a touch far subtler than the broad swipe of interest rate hikes.
The Fed must reassess the supremacy given to both its inflation fight and the use of interest rates as its primary policy tool. The risks that central bankers must balance have shifted. Inflation is far less threatening than the prospect of recession or slow growth, and raising interest rates to dampen inflation offers a cure that is often far worse than the disease. Successful reform will allow the Fed to get off the back of the U.S. economy and give America the more robust levels of growth that it deserves.
IT’S A SMALL WORLD AFTER ALL
This is a premium article
You must be a Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you are already a print subscriber, click here to activate your online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
The persistent deficit in the United States' balance of international payments and the continuing loss of gold have led to increasing discussion of national policies relating to gold and the dollar. While the issues involved are quite technical and complex, they are important to the future of the nation and the world. Broader understanding of the forces impinging on the nation's balance of payments is essential if the United States is to react properly to the changes in its role in the world economy.
The global economic crisis has revealed the folly of large U.S. budget and trade deficits, as well as of the strong dollar that makes them possible. If it is serious about recovery, the United States must balance the budget, stimulate private saving, and embrace a declining dollar.
Unless there is new legislation, the President will, at midnight on June 30, 1967, lose his power to cut American tariffs in trade bargains with other countries. The situation is familiar enough. Eleven times already the country has faced the question of renewing the grant of power first made in the Trade Agreements Act of 1934. Each time, Congress has prolonged the power, sometimes enlarging and sometimes reducing it. Mixing long-run policy and short-run tactics to get the best possible terms for the renewal of trade legislation is an old art in Washington. But this renewal is different.
