Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy
A balanced and lucid survey of the role of Congress in U.S. foreign policy. Lindsay, a political scientist at Iowa, takes aim at both "irreconcilables," who think the congressional role has assumed imperial dimensions, and "skeptics," who discount Congress' impact on policy. The congressional deference of the 1950s for which irreconcilables yearn (or for which they yearned when Republicans controlled the White House) is a historical anomaly. Skeptics, by contrast, underrate the efficacy of Congress in criticizing and legitimizing executive leadership. The study displays an easy command of historical and constitutional precedent and, despite its slim size, is a comprehensive introduction to the subject. The conclusion -- that one cannot eliminate Congress' vices without impairing its capacity to act virtuously -- is sound enough but perhaps too sunny in a political climate where a weakened president provides a strong temptation for destructive partisanship.
Related
President Clinton has tried to pursue a foreign policy agenda even more ambitious than his predecessor's. But as international realities and domestic priorities become clear, he has been forced to retreat in area after area of policy. The resulting flips and flops of policy toward Bosnia, Somalia, Haiti, North Korea, and China have undermined U.S. credibility. But more important, they risk making Americans turn inward in dismay, forsaking the prudent internationalism that has characterized American foreign policy since World War II. Let us abandon a kind of leadership we are not prepared to exercise on behalf of a world order the price of which we have no intention of paying.
Since the Democrats regained control of Congress, the Hill has been alive with the sound of hearings. Congress' earlier slumber and recent awakening should come as no surprise: for the last six decades, the partisan composition of Congress has defined the politics of war. Now facing a Democratic majority, President George W. Bush will find it far more difficult to stay in Iraq.
The process of nominating and confirming executive appointments is slow, burdensome, and intrusive. This failed system impedes good governance, frustrates nominees, and hampers recruitment. The next president must rationalize and streamline the appointment process -- starting now.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.