Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State
Despite its broad title, this eminently readable book focuses narrowly on international activities of banks and relations with governments over the past two decades, with heavy emphasis on increasing intergovernmental cooperation in supervision and regulation. It is well told.
There are chapters inter alia on the role of banks in recycling the large Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries payment surpluses in the mid-1970s and early 1980s, the international debt crisis of the mid-1980s, evolving bank regulation within the European Community as it moved toward a single market, and the dramatic closing of the Luxembourg-based Bank of Credit and Commerce International amid scandal in 1991.
The author's thesis is that the much-vaunted globalization of international finance, far from diminishing the role of governments, enhances their importance. Governments have risen to the challenge, and cooperation among them has increased considerably, at least as far as banks are concerned. As with developments in securities markets, the United States has typically provided the lead.
Related
A debate is unfolding over a new IMF proposal to avert future Argentina-style financial meltdowns: an international "Chapter 11" that would let a country declare bankruptcy, just like a troubled firm. Such a plan would represent an improvement over the current approach -- but it will not eliminate financial crises altogether.
Initially devised to maintain a system of fixed exchange rates, the IMF took on a new role during the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s-providing moderate amounts of credit, facilitating debt renegotiations, and recommending responsible macroeconomic policies. But the IMF is also applying the lessons of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, where a fundamental economic restructuring was necessary, to Asia. So in Korea, for example, the fund called for reform of inefficient conglomerates and inflexible labor laws. However beneficial in the long run, such changes are not needed to resolve the current crisis. By stepping in too far and too soon, the IMF discourages countries from seeking modest help. Even worse, it encourages bankers to undertake more risky loans, making another crisis more likely.
A new U.S. emphasis on African maritime development -- dedicated not only to rooting out piracy but also renovating ports and investing in job creation -- could improve African security and economic growth.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.