Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › Implementing the Comprehensive Test Ban: New Aspects of Definition, Organization, and Verification

Implementing the Comprehensive Test Ban: New Aspects of Definition, Organization, and Verification

Edited by Eric Arnett
Reviewed by By Eliot A. Cohen
May/June 1995
Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.
Edited by Eric Arnett
Oxford University Press
1995
128 pp.
$39.95

Largely a technical study. The authors are firm proponents of a comprehensive nuclear test ban (American reservations prior to the Clinton administration being defined as stonewalling). A brief but competent survey of issues pertaining to the monitoring of such a treaty, the monograph is silent on the kinds and consequences of cheating. The appendices include the Swedish and Australian drafts of a treaty, which the essays compare.

Related

Essay, May/Jun 1999
Getting It Backward on Iraq
F. Gregory Gause III

The Clinton administration supports crippling economic sanctions that punish the Iraqi people but seems ready to live with the demise of international inspections to monitor Saddam Hussein's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs. Washington has it exactly backward. It should offer Baghdad a blunt trade: lightened sanctions in return for renewed, intrusive arms inspections. The sweeping sanctions regime does nothing to advance U.S. interests, undermine Saddam, or contain Iraq. Leaving Saddam's arsenal unwatched is folly. Better to have arms inspections without sanctions than sanctions without arms inspections.

Read
Essay, May/Jun 1999
Sanctions of Mass Destruction
John Mueller and Karl Mueller

As Cold War threats have diminished, so-called weapons of mass destruction -- nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missiles -- have become the new international bugbears. The irony is that the harm caused by these weapons pales in comparison to the havoc wreaked by a much more popular tool: economic sanctions. Tally up the casualties caused by rogue states, terrorists, and unconventional weapons, and the number is surprisingly small. The same cannot be said for deaths inflicted by international sanctions. The math is sobering and should lead the United States to reconsider its current policy of strangling Iraq.

Read
Review Essay, Mar/Apr 1999
It Could Happen Here: Facing the New Terrorism
Gideon Rose

A raft of new books confronts a very real threat--the terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction--and propose vital, though moderate, responses.

Read