The Secret State: British Internal Security in the Twentieth Century
A British historian tackles the elusive story of official surveillance, security arrangements, and counterintelligence in the context of the great challenges to British interests, beginning with the harsh and sometimes ludicrous measures of the First World War and continued with the "red threat" as represented by the Soviet tie to the British Communist Party (the British had decoded Soviet intercepts in the early years of the Soviet regime), the Second World War, Northern Ireland, and the Cold War. After the defeat of France, the British government yielded to the demands of mi5 and other agencies and interned native fascists and enemy aliens, many of them refugees from Hitler's Germany, thereby expanding the infringements of rights beyond what had been done in the Great War. British security fastened on and infiltrated the communist party, largely unsuspecting that the real Soviet espionage was carried out by traitors within the establishment. The author relates that most of the time British authorities tried to strike a balance between the assumed needs of the state and the historical rights of the citizen. A sketchy if suggestive book, based on declassified material and on earlier extensive works such as Christopher M. Andrew's Her Majesty's Secret Service. Thurlow complains of Britain's "cult of secrecy," fiercer, he argues, than that of the United States.
Related
Washington wants to hire ex-Baathists to help rebuild Iraq. The CIA's experience using ex-Nazis to run West Germany's intelligence service should give it pause.
German history teaches that malice and simplicity have their appeal, that force impresses, and that nothing in the public realm is inevitable. It also proves that democratic reconstruction is possible, even on initially uncongenial ground.
Daniel Goldhagen's book on the Holocaust--condemning the German "eliminationist" mindset toward Jews--has become an international bestseller and a datum in German-American relations. Pity, because it is a simplistic, monocausal, and unhistorical explanation of one of the most complex horrors in history. For Goldhagen, as for the Nazis, Hitler is Germany.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.