Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic
A leading historian of modern Iran has crafted five excellent essays that together paint a convincing picture of Iran's recent development. Abrahamian begins by dismissing the notion that the Iranian revolution was rooted in fundamentalist Islam. On the contrary, Ayatollah Khomeini and his followers, by the time they mounted their challenge to the shah's regime, were using the language and political techniques of radical populism. This helps explain the attraction of a wide segment of the Iranian left to the Islamic revolution in its earliest phase. But Khomeini's populism was in part tactical. He had always maintained that private property should be respected, and he was very attentive to bazaar merchants. His was a middle-class revolution, which sought support among the downtrodden by promising to dispossess the wealthy aristocracy. Abrahamian, relying on original sources, traces Khomeini's intellectual trajectory from conservative mystic to outspoken radical and back to a more nuanced position between his more moderate and militant followers. Along the way he has wonderful insights into the uses and abuses of history, a chapter on the "paranoid style" in Iranian politics, and some concluding comments about the apparent triumph of the "moderates."
Related
Nearly a quarter-century after the revolution, economic failure and a bankrupt ideology have discredited the Islamic Republic. Despite the attention paid to a clash between "reformers" and "conservatives" in the government, the real story in Iran is the growing discontent among the generation born after 1979. This "Third Force" will eventually topple the regime, and the United States should just watch and wait.
For months, commentators have assumed that Iran's Green Movement was finished, but the history of political turmoil in twentieth-century Iran suggests otherwise.
Anxious to turn back a string of recent victories by President Mohammad Khatami and his reformist allies, Iran's conservatives have embarked on a campaign of bloody repression. As the two camps battle for control of the Islamic Republic, the proper moves from Washington just might tip the balance. Modest engagement can help Iran's moderates help themselves.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.