The Political Economy of Korea-United States Cooperation
This useful volume is the first product of the Korea-United States 21st Century Council, a forum launched in 1994 to bring together top officials, private sector leaders, and policy-oriented researchers. One of the prominent themes is the extreme displeasure of the U.S. business community as regards the South Korean investment climate. As Lawrence B. Krause puts it, although many American firms have formed partnerships with Korean firms, "a significant number have been unsatisfactory for the American side." Difficulties have included inadequate protection of intellectual property rights, restricted access to the Korean market, and excessive government interference with business that works disproportionately against foreign firms.
Robert Zoellick, a former Bush administration official, cites customs rules and product standards that are used to thwart importers, complains about anti-import campaigns and the caricaturing of foreign trade officials, and warns that these actions "paint an international image of Korea that is, to be frank, terrible."
According to the editors, the response to these charges from the Korean participants was mixed. Some readily acknowledged that the problem remains serious. Others were resentful, suggesting that only American investors have difficulties in Korea while those from Europe and Japan have been doing well. Despite these difficulties, the conference participants were mostly optimistic about the prospects for improving the Korean investment climate, given the current South Korean administration's commitment to reform.
Related
By the end of the decade U.S. trade and investment flows across the Pacific will be double transatlantic levels. President Clinton should use the November summit of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation to galvanize American economic efforts in the Far East and to ease trade tensions.
China's reform policies have created economic opportunities, but they have also unleashed political tensions. Some U.S. strategists advocate a containment strategy, yet such a strategy is both undesirable and infeasible. America's fortunes in Asia depend on the evolution of a China that is secure, cohesive, reform-oriented, and open to the world. Failed reform could easily lead to a nationalistic, obstructionist China. In recent years, Washington, while trying to engage the People's Republic, has driven it into a corner over human rights. America must develop a long-term strategy to integrate China into the world community and avert serious damage to this crucial bilateral relationship. And it must begin to do so now.
Pacific powers would like Korea to reunify slowly, but the North is soon likely to implode, its economy deteriorating as its weapons of mass destruction accumulate. Rapid reunification would spur economic growth, as in Germany, and reduce regional tensions. South Korea's liberalization of its own economy and strengthening of its civic institutions will prepare it to assist the North. China and Russia may not go along, but Western governments should stop coddling Pyongyang. America should underwrite a united Korea's security, and Japan its finances.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.