The Political Economy of Korea-United States Cooperation
This useful volume is the first product of the Korea--United States 21st Century Council, a forum launched in 1994 to bring together top officials, private sector leaders, and policy-oriented researchers. One of the prominent themes is the extreme displeasure of the U.S. business community as regards the South Korean investment climate. As Lawrence B. Krause puts it, although many American firms have formed partnerships with Korean firms, "a significant number have been unsatisfactory for the American side." Difficulties have included inadequate protection of intellectual property rights, restricted access to the Korean market, and excessive government interference with business that works disproportionately against foreign firms.
Robert Zoellick, a former Bush administration official, cites customs rules and product standards that are used to thwart importers, complains about anti-import campaigns and the caricaturing of foreign trade officials, and warns that these actions "paint an international image of Korea that is, to be frank, terrible."
According to the editors, the response to these charges from the Korean participants was mixed. Some readily acknowledged that the problem remains serious. Others were resentful, suggesting that only American investors have difficulties in Korea while those from Europe and Japan have been doing well. Despite these difficulties, the conference participants were mostly optimistic about the prospects for improving the Korean investment climate, given the current South Korean administration's commitment to reform.
Related
By the end of the decade U.S. trade and investment flows across the Pacific will be double transatlantic levels. President Clinton should use the November summit of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation to galvanize American economic efforts in the Far East and to ease trade tensions.
The United States is addicted to dollar devaluation. As a result, America has a false, euphoric sense of progress in its competition with Japan for key markets.
The Defense Department's new report on East Asia reads as if the Cold War is ongoing. For Japan, the report signals U.S. acceptance of its ruinous trade deficits. For other Asian nations, it signals the hollowness of American superpower pretensions. The report masks the failure of the Clinton administration's trade policy. By insisting Japan remain a U.S. protectorate, Washington encourages Tokyo's reactionaries. The real threat to Asian security is not China but U.S. distrust of Japan as a true ally. Cold War military power is irrelevant to the economic challenges posed by East Asia's dynamism. Someone should tell the Pentagon.
