The United Nations and Civil Wars; International Organizations and Civil Wars
These two books analyze U.N. interventions in civil wars of member states, spurred by recent crises in Somalia, Yugoslavia, Cambodia, and elsewhere. The volume edited by Weiss focuses on the multifunctional character of recent peacekeeping operations -- that is, U.N. involvement in civilian administration rather than just security operations -- which it argues is too often overlooked. The McCoubrey-White volume expatiates at great length on the international legal justifications for the expansion of U.N. involvement from external to internal conflicts. Of the two books, the former is more useful; rather than dwelling on the legalisms of intervention, it provides helpful analyses of actual U.N. operations. Both books chronicle the United Nations' weaknesses and failures; neither squarely confronts whether there is a fundamental flaw in the entire concept of U.N. peace enforcement, or whether the organization has become a dodge for nation-states seeking to evade international obligations.
Related
Two new books recognize that the United Nations cannot handle the burdens recently thrust upon it, but only one sees the need to set more realistic goals.
Noel Malcolm's history of Serbia's flashpoint province is marred by his sympathies for its ethnic Albanian separatists, anti-Serbian bias, and illusions about the Balkans.
Richard Holbrooke's gripping memoir shows how he improvised a makeshift peace in what was left of Bosnia despite a timorous Pentagon, a reluctant president, waweirding allies, and brutal ethnic cleansers. But the Dayton Accord came too late.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.