Bitter Harvest: Ideology and Politics in the Arab World
At a time when Islamic movements seem to set the tone for much of the political discourse in the Arab world, it is worth being reminded that many other ideologies have competed with political Islam in recent years. This finely crafted work is more than a history of ideas. The author centers the study of ideology in a sociopolitical context, arguing that ideology develops as the result of rapid social change that causes stress as new groups seek political power. He traces the class and generation bases for different phases of ideological development in the modern Arab world and highlights the evolution from the predominance of liberalism in the interwar period, to Arab nationalism after World War II, to the present assertiveness of Islamism. Each phase has lasted about a generation, and he sees a possibility that the age of ideology in the Arab world may be approaching its end. In seeking to explain the content of ideological movements, he examines the role of social class, minorities, youth, and severe crises that affect whole populations. He spends more time on Marxism than seems warranted by its relatively limited success in the Arab world and neglects the regional variants of nationalism that emerged in Algeria and among the Palestinians. But on the whole this is an impressive survey of a complex topic and deserves to be widely read.
Related
Easy access to quality education would bring developing countries everything from higher wages to lower infant mortality-but it would also require politically costly reforms. A global compact on education is needed to overcome the problem.
The economist Hernando de Soto argues in his new book that property rights are an essential ingredient for economic development. But this single-bullet theory would do better by noting the complex cultural factors that also affect growth.
Martin Kramer takes on U.S. academe for missing the growing Islamist threat while celebrating nonexistent Muslim democratization. Some of his charges sting, but his blame game goes too far. And defunding universities would hurt rather than help.
