Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars
A workmanlike effort, this book seeks to explain why civil wars, now the dominant form of conflict, are so hard to resolve. As in many efforts of this type, the book's real interest lies in the case studies of individual conflicts in Sri Lanka, Spain, Sudan, Ethiopia, Angola, South Africa, and so on; here they are, by and large, informative. The general conclusions point to the asymmetry of power and objectives as a major reason for the intractability of civil wars. The collection lays out a descriptive taxonomy but provides no startling insights as to how such conflicts ought to be resolved.
Related
A major new work on post-World War II Japan shows how the victorious Allies changed a conservative society unused to defeat and social transformation.
The American century, far from being over, is on the way. The information revolution, which capsized the Soviet Union and propelled Japan to eminence, has altered the equation of national power. America leads the world in the new technologies. Its emerging military systems can thwart any threat. On the "soft-power" side, it projects its ideals and other countries follow. To prevent an information race, America must share its lead; to preserve its reputation, it must keep its house in order.
The brutality in Kosovo, East Timor, and Rwanda has fed the conventional wisdom that tribal and nationalist fighting is raging out of control. It is not. Since the early 1990s, the number of new ethnic wars has dropped sharply and many old ones have been settled. The world has found a new way to manage secessionism and nationalist passions: granting autonomy, devolving and sharing state power, and recognizing group rights. Ethnic warfare's heyday may belong to the last century.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.