Render unto Caesar: The Religious Sphere in World Politics
This fascinating book reflects a growing recognition that old models linking modernization and secularization are not correct or apply best to limited parts of the world like Europe. Unlike other recent volumes on the fundamentalist upsurge, this one does not presume that the intrusion of religion into the political sphere is necessarily a pathological condition. Rather, it starts from the more neutral premise that religion has been and continues to be a major source of social values and hence is inevitably connected to political structures even in avowedly secular societies. The cases covered in the book will be more familiar to students of the sociology of religion than to international relations specialists, and they fill an important gap for the latter. The volume begins with historical cases (the impact of Mithraism on the Roman Empire) and surveys regions as diverse as Western Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent. Of particular interest are the chapters on religion in Serbia and Russia, which serve as informed counterpoints to the loose cultural generalizations that have been thrown around in public policy debates in recent years.
Related
To some degree, biology is destiny. The feminist school of international relations has a point: a truly matriarchal world would be less prone to conflict and more cooperative than the one we now inhabit. And world politics has been gradually feminizing over the past century. But the broader scene will still be populated by states led by men like Mobutu, Milosevic, or Saddam. If tomorrow's troublemakers are armed with nuclear weapons, we might be better off being led by women like Margaret Thatcher than, say, Gro Harlem Brundtland. Masculine policies will still be essential even in a feminized world.
Backing women's rights in developing countries isn't just good ethics; it's also sound economics. Growth and living standards get a dramatic boost when women are given just a bit more education, political clout, and economic opportunity. So the United States should aggressively promote women's rights abroad. And by couching its case in economic terms, it might even overcome the resistance of conservative Muslim countries that have long balked at gender equality.
Since winning elections in 2006, Hamas has demonstrated that it cannot be part of an Israeli-Palestinian peace process, nor part of a Palestinian body politic based on democracy and free elections. But can policymakers deny the group the ability to play the spoiler?

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.