Hitlers Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust
A challenging, powerfully argued, and morally passionate account of the extermination of the Jews by Nazi Germany. Goldhagen has done prodigious research in order to find out who the ‘willing executioners’ were and what they did. The result is overwhelming and devastating, not only because of the detailed account of the crimes, but also because the author shows that tens of thousands of ordinary Germans -- not just the SS or Nazis -- took part in the Holocaust, and because he systematically and convincingly dismisses such standard explanations as the habit of obedience, coercion, and group pressure. He shows that those who refused to become murderers were given the opportunity to opt out of the massacres and were not punished. The only convincing explanation is ideology: it is anti-Semitism that drove ordinary Germany to unspeakable murders. Goldhagen provides the reader with massive evidence of both the depth and scope of anti-Semitism in Nazi Germany and the degree to which it impregnated the political culture before Hitler. That part of his book is likely to be the most controversial. Goldhagen will probably be attacked for indicting a whole society. But nowhere does he deny that ‘eliminationism’ became ‘exterminationism’ because of the deliberate, systematic policies of Hitler and the Nazis, nor does he argue that every German was an eliminationist, nor does he say that a society cannot, by confronting its crimes, extirpate its worst prejudices and overcome its past. But those who believe that people are motivated only by self-interest will find his conclusion hard to accept, since it might oblige them to change their truncated view of human nature. It will not be possible to write about the Holocaust without taking into account the findings of this extraordinary book. In later works, the author may want to compare German anti-Semitism with that of France, Britain, or Russia to reinforce his point about its unique ‘eliminationist’ virulence in Germany.
Related
FOR five years between 1925 and 1929, a certain portion of mankind, like those parched travelers in the desert who think they have glimpsed the oasis which will save them, believed the gate to lasting peace was at hand. This, as we now know, was only a mirage. But such a mirage had never before existed. People had never believed so fervently in the blessings of peace, or hoped so passionately that peace would be perpetual. Optimism rose to new heights. "Away with cannon and machineguns: instead, conciliation, arbitration, and peace!" At the meeting of the League of Nations on September 10, 1926, when Germany, recently defeated, was received as a member, the French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand touched a new intensity of emotion with these celebrated words.
The surface was all smiles and harmony. After years of transatlantic distress, the major nations of the democratic West assembled in May in the splendor of Colonial Williamsburg to manifest their unity and their confidence. There were two new faces among the seven heads of state and government, both symbols of a significant political change in their respective countries: West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who had replaced Helmut Schmidt in October 1982 and whose party, the Christian Democrats, had just been confirmed by a massive popular vote on March 6, and Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone, the leader of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party and government who, in striking contrast to his predecessors, articulated a newly confident, internationally minded Japan.
After President Nixon and I met at Key Biscayne on December 28 and 29, 1971, a commentator pointed out that the joint statement issued on our talks seemed more like an American-European than an American-German communiqué. This, he felt, showed itself even on the surface in that the terms "European" or "Europe" appeared 11 times whereas German" or "Federal Republic of Germany" were only mentioned twice.
