Divided Sun: MITI and the Breakdown of Japanese High-Tech Industrial Policy, 1975-1993; The Origins of Japanese Trade Supremacy: Development and Technology in Asia From 1540 to the Pacific War
Here are two worthwhile books on what these days is called "industrial policy" as applied in Japan. Howe of the University of London recounts the evolution of the Japanese economy from the sixteenth century, when it first opened to European trade, to the 1930s. He emphasizes the Meiji era, with an interesting discussion of Japanese colonial policy in Taiwan and Manchuria, and Japan's sense of vulnerability over food supplies and markets for manufactured goods that led it to follow its disastrous path of conquest in the late 1930s. Howe observes that the distinctive blend of public policy and private enterprise that has characterized Japan down to the present has important historical origins. Noteworthy to Japan's commercial success was an early emphasis on education, especially mastery of foreign languages. As in most histories, there is no serious examination of possible alternative paths, so Japan's success is implicitly attributed to the policies it adopted.
Callon in effect takes up the story 40 years later, closely examining the role of the Japanese government, especially the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, in promoting technical and commercial success in electronics and computers. Concretely, he looks closely at the widely heralded government promotion of very large integrated circuits, supercomputers, so-called fifth generation "intelligent" computers, and major new software systems. Callon judges these recent attempts at industrial policy largely to have failed, integrated circuits partially excepted. Even when some technical successes were achieved, they were largely attributable to the actions of individual firms, not collective MITI-sponsored endeavors; MITI’s limited financial support was largely unproductive. He explores the strong interministerial and interfirm rivalries that now make successful concerted action difficult, and the resulting transformation of MITI from a ministry favoring close supervision and guidance of Japanese industry to one leaning strongly toward deregulation.
Related
The global financial turmoil that began in Thailand in 1997 has forced the international community to reevaluate the institutions, structures, and policies aimed at crisis prevention and resolution. In September 1998 President Clinton suggested that a distinguished private-sector group assess the need for reform of the international financial architecture. With this concern in mind, the Council on Foreign Relations sponsored the Independent Task Force on the Future of the International Financial Architecture, cochaired by Peter G. Peterson, chairman of both the Council and the Blackstone Group and secretary of commerce during the Nixon administration, and Carla A. Hills, CEO of Hills & Co. and U.S. Trade Representative during the Bush administration.
Soviet options in East Asia are limited by the USSR's lack of economic influence, but Gorbachev's new flexible diplomacy has led to limited advances. Discusses current relations with China, Japan, and the two Koreas, noting that influence in the Pacific region's economy is likely to be marginal for the next few decades. Concludes that prospects are good for a reduction in tension in the region.
For over half a century Japan and Germany have been at the heart of America's international preoccupations. After a long and destructive war against both countries, the United States worked exhaustively to help its two erstwhile enemies recover and build democratic societies secure under the American defense umbrella. From the late 1960s to the mid-1980s, victor and vanquished moved to a more balanced relationship, especially in trade and finance. Today, in one of history's great role reversals, Tokyo and Bonn have become Washington's fierce trading rivals and also its primary bankers.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.