Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of U.S.-Latin American Relations
Smith, Simon Bolivar Professor of Latin American Studies at University of California, San Diego, and former president of the Latin American Studies Association, has written one of the most ambitious books in recent years on U.S.-Latin American relations. He presents three general "systems": the 1790s to the 1920s, characterized by the balance of power, multilateral rivalry, and imperial pretentions; the Cold War, when the U.S.-Soviet bipolar rivalry was preeminent; and the current period, marked by U.S. "hegemony by default," in which Latin America is diminished as a U.S. political asset but enhanced in economic importance. Smith remains skeptical about the new wave of market-oriented reform and democratic instaturations and worries that Latin America has fewer options within the current post-Cold War context. He compares the new "age of uncertainty" to the imperial era and urges Latin America to maintain "collective solidarity," reject "individual advantage," and "revitalize the Bolivarian dream of Latin American unity." But this view seems oddly old-fashioned when the accelerating cross-penetration of culture, peoples, and capital within the western hemisphere seems every day more characteristic of the world now unfolding. It is curious how U.S. Latin Americanists tend to be more Latin Americanist than the objects of their study, who have learned the hard way to know a dead end when they see it.
Related
Post-communism has been bad for women in Eastern Europe: their representation, employment, and safety have suffered. America must support women leaders and entrepreneurs for the transition to democracy and capitalism to be complete.
Pacific powers would like Korea to reunify slowly, but the North is soon likely to implode, its economy deteriorating as its weapons of mass destruction accumulate. Rapid reunification would spur economic growth, as in Germany, and reduce regional tensions. South Korea's liberalization of its own economy and strengthening of its civic institutions will prepare it to assist the North. China and Russia may not go along, but Western governments should stop coddling Pyongyang. America should underwrite a united Korea's security, and Japan its finances.
Fidel Castro is not on the way out anytime soon. In fact, he may be the best guarantor of Cuba's peaceful transition to a market-oriented economy and more democratic government. A good analogy is with Spanish autocrat Francisco Franco. Like Franco, Castro allied himself with the losing side in the grand sweep of history, but he has slowly reintegrated his nation with the world by pushing tourism, seeking foreign investment, gradually liberalizing the political system, and expanding civil liberties. Castro has more support in Cuba than many in the West think, and the United States should begin a phaseout of its embargo tied to Cuba's economic and political performance.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.