The New Military in Russia: Ten Myths That Shape the Image
A dense book packed with footnotes and tables, in which the author takes a dark view of the Russian military's present and future. Despite its claims to the contrary, the military engages in politics, resists reform, seeks to preserve the military- industrial complex, flouts arms control treaties, and generally poses a considerable threat to the future of Russian democracy and the tranquillity of Russia's neighbors. Staar's credentials, including diplomatic service and a doctorate in political science, are considerable, and he has amassed a great deal of interesting Russian-language material to support his contentions. One wonders, however, whether the decay of the Russian army, the turmoil of the Russian economy, and the gradual liberalization of Russia's political culture might not ameliorate the dark trends the author sees, and one wishes there were more argument and less mere fact-assembling here. Still, a disturbing book worth a look.
Related
The military campaign in Afghanistan has been, for the most part, a masterpiece of creativity and finesse. It may wind up being one of the most notable U.S. military successes since World War II. But the American strategy has also had flaws. Most important, by contracting out much of the work to undependable local proxies, it may have allowed Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda leaders to escape -- and menace the world down the road.
Gorbachev's new thinking is based on the belief that military power is not the only way to national security, and that there is a link between national and mutual security. The revolution in foreign policy thinking has been most profound at the level of policy concepts, and has been based on a realization that the real threat to the USSR comes from the weakening of the economy due to excessive military spending. Notes how the ideas underpinning the foreign policy revolution have existed for the last decade, and how the evidence suggests that the change is genuine.
As the Pentagon prepares to redeploy U.S. forces around the world, it should review its practice of setting up bases in nondemocratic states. Although defense officials claim that having U.S. footholds in repressive countries offers important strategic advantages, the practice rarely helps promote liberalization in host states and sometimes even endangers U.S. security.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.